Re: [netmod] Inventory YANG model (entity-MIB)

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:53:37AM -0500, Susan Hares wrote:
>>>
>>> As technical advisor, do you know if the Entity-MIB work scheduled for
>>> upgrading to a yang module?
>>
>> No.
>>
>>> If not, is there a working group where we could suggest an
>>> equivalent model.
>>
>> The NETMOD working group would likely be the first stop unless the
>> IESG wants to proceed with a more targetted approach.
>
> Let's make it clear for everybody.
> NETMOD is the place where an ENTITY-MIB based YANG model must happen.
> As Jürgen points it out below, the charter was modified for this type of
> work.
>
> So we discussed the WHERE, the next question is WHO?

I would be interested on working on the YANG version of the Entity MIB.
I think it should be updated so that SNMP agents can coexist with
the NETCONF/RESTCONF version with minimal or no impact
on existing instrumentation.

>
> Regards, Benoit (AD hat on)

Andy

>>
>> The NETMOD
>> charter says:
>>
>>     The NETMOD WG may also develop any additional data models written
>>     in YANG that the WG considers core building blocks and that do not
>>     fall under the charters of other active IETF working groups.
>>
>>> As to config true,  this Data model seems IMHO (jie may correct me) one
>>> of
>>> the I2RS model that wants to have ephemeral state but also change things
>>> in
>>> the data store.
>>
>> Ephemeral is kind of surprising for me.
>>
>> /js
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod