Re: [Netslices] draft-qiang-netslices-gap-analysis-00 Uploaded

[Alex Galis <[e-mail]>]

Dear Greg,

Thank you for your valuable comments and review which would be accommodated in the revised version "draft-qiang-netslices-gap-analysis-01” planed before IETF99

Best Regards
Alex 
> On 9 Jun 2017, at 19:15, Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Dear Authors, et. al,
> thank you for your dedicated work. I believe that this is very much need document. I have some comments to OAM section:
> it will be helpful to give interpretation of OAM per RFC 6921 in the Introduction section rather than hold it off till Section 9;
> opening of the Section 9 lists mix of requirements and use cases. I agree that these are needed to help us to identify the gaps between what is available and what is required of OAM protocols. In Overlay OAM DT we've started with the requirements document <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ooamdt-rtgwg-ooam-requirement-02> and then worked through the gap analysis <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ooamdt-rtgwg-oam-gap-analysis-02>. I think that these documents may be used in discussing OAM;
> in addition to [I-D.ooamdt-rtgwg-ooam-header] that proposes Overlay Associated Channel there's Overlay Echo Request/Reply <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ooamdt-rtgwg-demand-cc-cv-03> draft that may be of use and re-use.
> Regards,
> Greg
> 
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 2:36 AM, qiangli (D) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
>  
> 
> We have upload "Gap Analysis for Network Slicing" draft 00 on https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-qiang-netslices-gap-analysis/?include_text=1 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-qiang-netslices-gap-analysis/?include_text=1>
> Your comments and reviews are greatly appreciated.
> 
>  
> 
> Abstract:
> 
>    This document presents network slicing differentiation from the non-
> 
>    partition network or from simply partition of connectivity resources.
> 
>    It lists 15 standardization gaps related to 6 key requirements for
> 
>    network slicing.  It also presents an analysis of existing related
> 
>    work and other potential solutions on network slicing.
> 
>  
> 
>    This gap analysis document aims to provide a basis for future works
> 
>    in network slicing.
> 
>  
> 
> Best regards,
> 
>  
> 
> Co-authors
> 
>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netslices mailing list
> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netslices mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices