IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netslices] draft-qiang-netslices-gap-analysis-00 Uploaded

"qinjun (G)" <qinjun4@huawei.com> Tue, 06 June 2017 05:53 UTC

Return-Path: <qinjun4@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netslices@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netslices@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D89127337 for <netslices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 22:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b_xDhzr9Wf-B for <netslices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 22:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F0E4126BF7 for <NetSlices@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 22:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DHY92377; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 05:53:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEMM404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.212) by lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 06:53:48 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.16]) by DGGEMM404-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.212]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 13:53:41 +0800
From: "qinjun (G)" <qinjun4@huawei.com>
To: "NetSlices@ietf.org" <NetSlices@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-qiang-netslices-gap-analysis-00 Uploaded
Thread-Index: AdLbg6wkZDvFET2IQnSWu3FhZDRtRgDBYyhA
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 05:53:41 +0000
Message-ID: <59CD2F00E2D8144585080083DB2D05D2029B6925@DGGEMM506-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <06C389826B926F48A557D5DB5A54C4ED29BB624F@SZXEMI507-MBS.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <06C389826B926F48A557D5DB5A54C4ED29BB624F@SZXEMI507-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.130.148.217]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_59CD2F00E2D8144585080083DB2D05D2029B6925DGGEMM506MBSchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020206.5936436E.0104, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.4.16, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 2afcf545dead4264b27f96bcd6c57b94
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netslices/RAOr0e0sHTmLSw_tsPcaXZvbYek>
Subject: Re: [Netslices] draft-qiang-netslices-gap-analysis-00 Uploaded
X-BeenThere: netslices@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is intended for discussion and review of network slicing at IETF." <netslices.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netslices>, <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netslices/>
List-Post: <mailto:netslices@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices>, <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 05:53:55 -0000

Hi, Cristina:

Thanks for your contribution work. The draft could be a good reference and basis for the network slicing related work.

After reading the whole draft, I am wondering about the difference between  VN in ACTN and network slicing, and  still a little confused about the meaning of "ACTN is path-oriented (i.e., TE tunnel based), whilst network slicing is resource-oriented." Which mentioned in the third paragraph in section 5.2.2.  What is the exact meaning of "path-oriented" and "resource-oriented"? In my understanding, in VN of ACTN, there's no explicit limitation that it cannot control the network resources, by using suitable technology, I think the "path" can be combined with the underlay resources.  About figure 4, in network slicing environment, if LSP1 and 2 belongs to two  slices, although the whole bandwidth on path C-D has no change, but the bandwidth of each slice changed, I think it still need reconfiguration.

Best regards
Jun Qin


From: Netslices [mailto:netslices-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of qiangli (D)
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 5:36 PM
To: NetSlices@ietf.org
Subject: [Netslices] draft-qiang-netslices-gap-analysis-00 Uploaded


Dear All,



We have upload "Gap Analysis for Network Slicing" draft 00 on https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-qiang-netslices-gap-analysis/?include_text=1

Your comments and reviews are greatly appreciated.



Abstract:

   This document presents network slicing differentiation from the non-

   partition network or from simply partition of connectivity resources.

   It lists 15 standardization gaps related to 6 key requirements for

   network slicing.  It also presents an analysis of existing related

   work and other potential solutions on network slicing.



   This gap analysis document aims to provide a basis for future works

   in network slicing.

Best regards,

Co-authors

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email