IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netslices] draft-qiang-netslices-gap-analysis-00 Uploaded

Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de> Fri, 02 June 2017 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>
X-Original-To: netslices@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netslices@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6368D12946D for <netslices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BUEkNpEotOHG for <netslices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailext.sit.fraunhofer.de (mailext.sit.fraunhofer.de [141.12.72.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A11D3128E19 for <NetSlices@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 07:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sit.fraunhofer.de (mail.sit.fraunhofer.de [141.12.84.171]) by mailext.sit.fraunhofer.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id v52EO6OJ029631 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 2 Jun 2017 16:24:07 +0200
Received: from [134.102.166.186] (134.102.166.186) by mail.sit.fraunhofer.de (141.12.84.171) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 16:24:01 +0200
To: sebastian.thalanany@ieee.org, "'qiangli (D)'" <qiangli3@huawei.com>, NetSlices@ietf.org
References: <06C389826B926F48A557D5DB5A54C4ED29BB624F@SZXEMI507-MBS.china.huawei.com> <007d01d2dba4$63c21930$2b464b90$@gmail.com>
From: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Message-ID: <2e43c34e-649c-f06b-e551-78b37357f32e@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 16:24:01 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <007d01d2dba4$63c21930$2b464b90$@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [134.102.166.186]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netslices/8MmOMMA2oj597qLvusGrySbLVMM>
Subject: Re: [Netslices] draft-qiang-netslices-gap-analysis-00 Uploaded
X-BeenThere: netslices@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is intended for discussion and review of network slicing at IETF." <netslices.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netslices>, <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netslices/>
List-Post: <mailto:netslices@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices>, <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 14:24:16 -0000

+1 aggregating and defining of legacy, current and maybe "new" terms 
will prevent confusing when trying to talk about the same thing.

BR,
Henk

On 06/02/2017 03:30 PM, sebastian wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
> 
> Thanks for delineating the prominent aspects of network slicing.
> 
> Here are some thoughts on terminology.
> 
> With the diverse nature of services in the 5G realm, where XaaS 
> (Anything as a Service) is an emerging paradigm, perhaps some of the 
> legacy terminology may need to be generalized.
> 
> For example, the term ‘operator’ was typically used with reference to 
> various types of ‘access’ modalities.
> 
> In NGMN, such terminology is being generalized.
> 
> *NSP*: Network Service Provider (instead of ‘operator’): This entity 
> only provides ‘access’ type of services
> 
> *SP*: Service Provider: This entity provides any service above the 
> network layer, but may also behave as an NSP
> 
> Best wishes.
> 
> -Sebastian
> 
> *From:*Netslices [mailto:netslices-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of 
> *qiangli (D)
> *Sent:* Friday, June 2, 2017 4:36 AM
> *To:* NetSlices@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [Netslices] draft-qiang-netslices-gap-analysis-00 Uploaded
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> We have upload "Gap Analysis for Network Slicing" draft 00 on 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-qiang-netslices-gap-analysis/?include_text=1
> 
> Your comments and reviews are greatly appreciated.
> 
> Abstract:
> 
>     This document presents network slicing differentiation from the non-
> 
>     partition network or from simply partition of connectivity resources.
> 
>     It lists 15 standardization gaps related to 6 key requirements for
> 
>     network slicing.  It also presents an analysis of existing related
> 
>     work and other potential solutions on network slicing.
> 
>     This gap analysis document aims to provide a basis for future works
> 
>     in network slicing.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Co-authors
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netslices mailing list
> Netslices@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email