IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netslices] draft-qiang-netslices-gap-analysis-00 Uploaded

GENG Liang <liang.geng@hotmail.com> Fri, 02 June 2017 20:58 UTC

Return-Path: <liang.geng@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: netslices@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netslices@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3ABE12422F for <netslices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.125
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.125 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=0.874, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hotmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K4zjO_bSiilS for <netslices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092254016.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.254.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8902126DD9 for <NetSlices@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=BJ/ACcSG2/fJRqhk2YbEfFVC/9qu9AFtAYCFCMoCSEA=; b=Snqzdi68UcP6FxDgh8+hTbP7ybhIQEeFw69EfdI5FxVJN2vPjJmFEPjtCETJxV+hQMj95FOZSAChqKv2OU3Spc2UKpIGJ28JFOUSB3GBwozpU4DcwVLt0IIvXYvO7GFCiWnHEHWQXrl9Le2jRl8tcZKEA98jR8/mBdiuCao7VU3O6FiAjTCxlodU8u2S1lfx5CmFaQZ0yQa4z434qdNelSXJxVWHuWbP5lcGgi62aVRynbYHfNJiLvE5jToKiKzn5BKVRHUIrlxy2gUR2My+4M69XCTCB4mUCC9eoLJJOjLe3ZtWtwChwds5sFtdmtZsePssIbUj4ZXjPRNROgxstw==
Received: from HK2APC01FT041.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.248.59) by HK2APC01HT223.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.249.171) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.1101.12; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 20:58:52 +0000
Received: from HK2PR06MB0913.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.152.248.59) by HK2APC01FT041.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.249.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1101.12 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 20:58:52 +0000
Received: from HK2PR06MB0913.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::75cd:525b:c4f3:a11f]) by HK2PR06MB0913.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::75cd:525b:c4f3:a11f%14]) with mapi id 15.01.1143.013; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 20:58:52 +0000
From: GENG Liang <liang.geng@hotmail.com>
To: "sebastian.thalanany" <sebastian.thalanany@ieee.org>, "'qiangli (D)'" <qiangli3@huawei.com>, "netslices@ietf.org" <NetSlices@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Re: [Netslices] draft-qiang-netslices-gap-analysis-00 Uploaded
Thread-Index: AdLbg6wkZDvFET2IQnSWu3FhZDRtRg==
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 20:58:52 +0000
Message-ID: <HK2PR06MB0913CB13A7089DE72A48D2AE87F70@HK2PR06MB0913.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <06C389826B926F48A557D5DB5A54C4ED29BB624F@SZXEMI507-MBS.china.huawei.com>, <007d01d2dba4$63c21930$2b464b90$@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ieee.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ieee.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=hotmail.com;
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:6D329E939E9E543579FB635151FBFC163E44F382AC40217FAA6F4F6E19392CF0; UpperCasedChecksum:AF8FC6F1A9587C2E9F505766486F71B01D8FF3ECD373C5102FCC742EAD9924FD; SizeAsReceived:8376; Count:44
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-tmn: [beMyN/3GBeDkmTZ+o2DCW4krfl/+5V8h]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; HK2APC01HT223; 24:TdX9bvgGZBKTFyvezyCbjYoh9BtOCFCyHSlrN3hjcX+QFQ75o0O+eTU0ee3mJ0SLSG7vIhLWuJZ882lMGfQUY/YyRVtJC8Cx2B9YwZSo4lg=; 7:f8t9K5ek77CLBCsAbV7dybhOrHo5doJ0aNjK0oLOfqZqmHYQU3wKesLrcpPHjl1A7Rhzdg0H2q79BLnV1n0ODBoMpvZ7QzGHNi8XqMZM2LIrf4JDfMi2Tmd0VQtplV+C0OgQLj19O7tb/LefYBnrSJ30CSUcG5pw7cvJ2pqS1ulnZoQasio7knSpv2TEQo+QmxsvDmz18SYQnAkKcsnS0NM0bcT8DXW40Wqbsl5R8BADcXkO6lxw/pIzu0xXgILliyiOTiOYVDWRjSaRWFlevKu5wjQJe21Pc/KosMhEI3dGDEWExQaHghwOlwE908N6
x-incomingheadercount: 44
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:HK2APC01HT223; H:HK2PR06MB0913.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HK2APC01HT223:
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 26d9a0fd-8a22-438e-5d44-08d4a9fa2a85
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322274)(1601125374)(1603101448)(1701031045); SRVR:HK2APC01HT223;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(444000031); SRVR:HK2APC01HT223; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:HK2APC01HT223;
x-forefront-prvs: 03264AEA72
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_HK2PR06MB0913CB13A7089DE72A48D2AE87F70HK2PR06MB0913apcp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Jun 2017 20:58:52.1541 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HK2APC01HT223
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netslices/Q-Ktf1M_EirEwh6bX72uvD_QVFQ>
Subject: Re: [Netslices] draft-qiang-netslices-gap-analysis-00 Uploaded
X-BeenThere: netslices@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is intended for discussion and review of network slicing at IETF." <netslices.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netslices>, <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netslices/>
List-Post: <mailto:netslices@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices>, <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 20:58:59 -0000

Hi Sebastian,

We have defined term with similar generalization concernsin Architecture draft. All other rnetslices draft is referring to these terminologies. This document can be find here
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-geng-netslices-architecture-01

Best wishes
Liang

________________________________
Liang GENG
China Mobile Research Institute

From: sebastian<mailto:comscape@gmail.com>
Date: 2017-06-02 21:30
To: 'qiangli \(D\)'<mailto:qiangli3@huawei.com>; NetSlices@ietf.org<mailto:NetSlices@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Netslices] draft-qiang-netslices-gap-analysis-00 Uploaded
Dear Colleagues,

Thanks for delineating the prominent aspects of network slicing.

Here are some thoughts on terminology.

With the diverse nature of services in the 5G realm, where XaaS (Anything as a Service) is an emerging paradigm, perhaps some of the legacy terminology may need to be generalized.
For example, the term ‘operator’ was typically used with reference to various types of ‘access’ modalities.

In NGMN, such terminology is being generalized.
NSP : Network Service Provider (instead of ‘operator’): This entity only provides ‘access’ type of services
SP: Service Provider: This entity provides any service above the network layer, but may also behave as an NSP

Best wishes.
-Sebastian


From: Netslices [mailto:netslices-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of qiangli (D)
Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 4:36 AM
To: NetSlices@ietf.org
Subject: [Netslices] draft-qiang-netslices-gap-analysis-00 Uploaded


Dear All,



We have upload "Gap Analysis for Network Slicing" draft 00 on https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-qiang-netslices-gap-analysis/?include_text=1

Your comments and reviews are greatly appreciated.



Abstract:

   This document presents network slicing differentiation from the non-

   partition network or from simply partition of connectivity resources.

   It lists 15 standardization gaps related to 6 key requirements for

   network slicing.  It also presents an analysis of existing related

   work and other potential solutions on network slicing.



   This gap analysis document aims to provide a basis for future works

   in network slicing.

Best regards,

Co-authors

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email