IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [NGO] NETMOD charter

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@cesnet.cz> Mon, 17 March 2008 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ngo-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ngo-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ngo-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A4028C38F; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 07:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.102, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 918ef0qGD2Tp; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 07:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B023A6A8E; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 07:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ngo@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ngo@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFD33A6CD2 for <ngo@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 07:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AdYdrpXhK3sF for <ngo@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 07:22:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from office2.cesnet.cz (office2.cesnet.cz [195.113.144.244]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB7A28C3C1 for <ngo@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 07:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.29.2.201] (asus-gx.lhotka.cesnet.cz [195.113.161.161]) by office2.cesnet.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E292D800CC for <ngo@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:20:00 +0100 (CET)
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@cesnet.cz>
To: ngo@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <47DE2B3E.1000909@andybierman.com>
References: <47DDBB90.1040803@andybierman.com> <004301c887f8$4ad3e8e0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <47DE2B3E.1000909@andybierman.com>
Organization: CESNET
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:19:59 +0100
Message-Id: <1205763599.5718.9.camel@missotis>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1
Subject: Re: [NGO] NETMOD charter
X-BeenThere: ngo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF Goes On - discussions on future work and extensions to NETCONF <ngo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo>, <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ngo>
List-Post: <mailto:ngo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo>, <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Sender: ngo-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ngo-bounces@ietf.org

Andy Bierman píše v Po 17. 03. 2008 v 01:26 -0700:
> We have also been using XSD for the canonical XML syntax
> representation in protocol documents for quite some time.
> I strong object to changing this policy to RelaxNG or DSDL
> without IETF Approval first.

XSD only deals with grammar, so mapping from YANG could be lossless only
with quite considerable appInfo extensions that would IMO beg the
question of mapping to *standard* validation languages - I believe this
was the requirement expressed by Chris Newman on behalf of application
area. Standard DSDL can capture most of YANG semantics and the necessary
domain-specific extensions will be relatively minor - e.g., signatures
of RPC operations.

Lada

-- 
Ladislav Lhotka, CESNET
PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C

_______________________________________________
NGO mailing list
NGO@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email