IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [NGO] NETMOD charter

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Mon, 17 March 2008 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ngo-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ngo-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ngo-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D50A3A6E10; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.686
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.686 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.249, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gQVydZx2JiK0; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998A53A6ABE; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ngo@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ngo@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465D33A6AA4 for <ngo@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IyKFX+6KZrPB for <ngo@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AAA3A6946 for <ngo@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,512,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="112857014"
Received: from unknown (HELO nj300815-nj-erheast.avaya.com) ([198.152.6.5]) by co300216-co-outbound.avaya.com with ESMTP; 17 Mar 2008 11:36:07 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,512,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="169564686"
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.13]) by nj300815-nj-erheast-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 17 Mar 2008 11:36:06 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:36:09 +0100
Message-ID: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0424AFAD@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <47DE8EF7.9010807@andybierman.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [NGO] NETMOD charter
Thread-Index: AciIRB/rFsdIdFZ8TcmQsOs3Or4p3wAAEX/g
References: <47DDBB90.1040803@andybierman.com><004301c887f8$4ad3e8e0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <47DE2B3E.1000909@andybierman.com> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0424AFA4@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <47DE8A32.2050903@andybierman.com> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0424AFAC@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <47DE8EF7.9010807@andybierman.com>
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>
Cc: NETCONF Goes On <ngo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [NGO] NETMOD charter
X-BeenThere: ngo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF Goes On - discussions on future work and extensions to NETCONF <ngo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo>, <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ngo>
List-Post: <mailto:ngo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo>, <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ngo-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ngo-bounces@ietf.org

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Bierman [mailto:ietf@andybierman.com] 
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 5:32 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: Randy Presuhn; NETCONF Goes On
> Subject: Re: [NGO] NETMOD charter
> 
> Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> >  
> >.....
> > 
> > If you refer to what happens after all this is defined, I 
> do not think 
> > that each DM document needs to be written (and reviewed) in 
> the three 
> > formats. The mandatory format is the one expressed in the 
> > operator-friendly DML, other are optional and MAY be 
> defined from case 
> > to case.
> > 
> 
> It has not been my experience that the IESG will give you a 
> free pass because the text on certain pages is 'optional'.  
> I'm pretty sure if you include RNG and/or DSDL documents in a 
> standards-track document, that text will need to be reviewed, 
> even though it is in non-normative sections.

Yes - I agree. Many people think however that these formats are useful,
so I guess they will provide their support for writing and reviewing
such pieces of code when they show up in the documents. 

Dan

> 
_______________________________________________
NGO mailing list
NGO@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email