IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [NGO] NETMOD charter

"David Harrington" <ietfdbh@comcast.net> Mon, 17 March 2008 21:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ngo-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ngo-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ngo-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909CE3A6E90; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.653
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.653 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.216, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MZMdt2Csij+T; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC3D3A6E30; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ngo@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ngo@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916A93A6E70 for <ngo@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FC5HqXG1dA7H for <ngo@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from QMTA03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.32]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9BC3A6C4C for <ngo@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from OMTA03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.27]) by QMTA03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2Jqg1Z0080b6N64A306M00; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:01:36 +0000
Received: from Harrington73653 ([24.128.66.199]) by OMTA03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2M331Z00L4HwxpC8P00000; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:03:09 +0000
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=qrki0zSmaTaXOYHtOj8A:9 a=2AC-Ev7qUy9snunkqmjtdK7pP-QA:4 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=50e4U0PicR4A:10
From: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
To: "'Romascanu, Dan (Dan)'" <dromasca@avaya.com>, 'Andy Bierman' <ietf@andybierman.com>, 'Randy Presuhn' <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
References: <47DDBB90.1040803@andybierman.com><004301c887f8$4ad3e8e0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer><47DE2B3E.1000909@andybierman.com> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0424AFA4@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:03:03 -0400
Message-ID: <002e01c88872$4b637e40$6c02a8c0@china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: AciICKa+7XhArHVEQvWVLPPvO4XSeAAKWImQABAM4CA=
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138
In-Reply-To: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0424AFA4@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
Cc: 'NETCONF Goes On' <ngo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [NGO] NETMOD charter
X-BeenThere: ngo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF Goes On - discussions on future work and extensions to NETCONF <ngo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo>, <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ngo>
List-Post: <mailto:ngo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo>, <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ngo-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ngo-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

We have photographs of the architecture, don't we? ;-)

dbh 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ngo-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ngo-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 9:46 AM
> To: Andy Bierman; Randy Presuhn
> Cc: NETCONF Goes On
> Subject: Re: [NGO] NETMOD charter
> 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ngo-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ngo-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> > Behalf Of Andy Bierman
> > 
> > We have also been using XSD for the canonical XML syntax 
> > representation in protocol documents for quite some time.
> > I strong object to changing this policy to RelaxNG or DSDL 
> > without IETF Approval first.
> > 
> > 
> 
> Allow me to express shortly my view as a contributor. 
> 
> I do not believe that we deal here with a change in policy. The
> canonical XML syntax representation stays with us as the 'on the
wire'
> interoperability level. We are introducing an 
> operator-friendly language
> that is described by Randy in his preliminary charter draft and the
> mapping between the operator-friendly level and the XML. 
> These would be
> the mandatory-to-implement elements of the framework
> 
> We also recognize that there is a place for a machine-friendly
> representation that would accommodate existing tools and allow for
> import of existing XML schemes already defined by other WGs 
> in the IETF
> or other SDOs, in RelaxNG or DSDL or other. Mappings between the
> operator-friendly language and RelaxNG or DSDL would be 
> optional, but at
> least one of them will be a loss-less translation. 
> 
> See the below. I am not too strong in ASCII art, maybe somebody can
> help. 
> 
> ---------------------------
> |Operator Friendly |
> ---------------------------
> |
> |  |  |
> |    |    |
> |      |      |
> |        |        |
> |          |         |
> |  --------------  -----------
> | | RelaxNG| | DSDL|
> |  --------------  ----------
> |          |         |
> |        |         |
> |      |       |
> |    |      |
> -------------
> |  XML   |
> -------------
> 
> Does this make sense? 
> 
> Dan
> _______________________________________________
> NGO mailing list
> NGO@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo
> 


_______________________________________________
NGO mailing list
NGO@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email