[NGO] NETMOD charter

[Andy Bierman <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

I would like to get a NETMOD WG chartered before the next IETF,
not keep having BoFs that may eventually lead to a WG some year.

I strongly support a NETCONF MIB language as the highest priority,
and next step in a workable NETCONF-based CM solution.  However,
there needs to be some agreement and clarity on what the
finished NETCONF-managed system looks like.

Just because CLI development tends to be an organic, ad-hoc,
uncontrolled process, does not mean the IETF standards process should
be the same.  Full support for vendor innovation is important,
but this must coexist with an (anticipated) ever-increasing set
of standard modules.

First the base protocol. Then notifications. Then partial locking, etc.
I really don't see much of a system-oriented development plan here,
if the end goal is supposed to be standards-based *configuration*.


Andy

_______________________________________________
NGO mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo