Re: [NGO] NETCONF Data types

"Sharon Chisholm" writes:
>This was intended as a design time definition.

Then I'm lost.  You said earlier:

>> In that case, a better approach is likely a complex type
>> which gives length and value. This way if you handle all lengths, you
>> just need to look at the value field.

Where is the complex type?  Sounded like you meant to encode both
the length and the value in the transmitted data.  What's the value
of carrying to length if the module definition tells you the max length?
Or am I misreading you completely?

Thanks,
 Phil

_______________________________________________
NGO mailing list
NGO@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo