Re: [Ntp] [tsvwg] Antw: [EXT] Re: [Tsv‑art] Tsvart early review of draft‑ietf‑ntp‑alternative‑port‑02

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 06 December 2021 14:55 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED0F3A0942; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 06:55:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.701, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id beTnx_WePz04; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 06:55:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3F433A0937; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 06:55:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with ESMTP id 1B6D7vSU016548; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 14:55:15 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=AG1K2A9kZZ8/x5/TzAbJJqfWSi2/semncFa8TLIzxGg=; b=Cq29Xu1oXKslEPcf1Gav7+u/oiU1Fayk37oyPfxyL9PjE3UxmMt0k8yO97g5+HbRmsgC SfiF9e3VMbCfNZL/kJ+jmsXr8G5XIBc/DVSoJckRsZs/AwpcKy8og5RhGZxgwYWLNjmS Fyra2dBdSW0NImcO9b7TesUkpSXnDp9OnzkvRfgt6mgL9dnSJ5FfNPnWgs3QZDx238UE XebATa4Yfy3MMRr7M6Si0NzaOVotAeysvJX9ap9Y6SRew6c5ILX+rlEw1X+XgqHuZ1dH ONhqMyH0k+notYVWNmIsNt8HPXv1IiF+u+G5VXEgSOiboqAW7vZNF2xl4kVqal4cPcrj /g==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18] (may be forged)) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3cs1scyxar-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 06 Dec 2021 14:55:15 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 1B6EpqIF026361; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 09:55:14 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.30]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3cr4j3k6ys-4 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 06 Dec 2021 09:55:14 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) by usma1ex-dag3mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.26; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 09:53:34 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.26; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 09:53:34 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.026; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 09:53:33 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>, Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>, "halmurray@sonic.net" <halmurray@sonic.net>, "touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com>
CC: "magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com" <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "iana-port-experts@icann.org" <iana-port-experts@icann.org>, "draft-ietf-ntp-alternative-port.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ntp-alternative-port.all@ietf.org>, "tsv-art@ietf.org" <tsv-art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ntp] [tsvwg] Antw: [EXT] Re: [Tsv‑art] Tsvart early review of draft‑ietf‑ntp‑alternative‑port‑02
Thread-Index: AQHX6ope5yOBjlsPn0yXDij1nnhaSqwljP4A
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2021 14:53:33 +0000
Message-ID: <3EBE312A-6403-48EF-95E0-E6F9FE06A470@akamai.com>
References: <20211204231206.A534228C17A@107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net> <61ADC2E6020000A100046157@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <b694a433-8555-0eed-e38f-c15c0e2a6e98@lear.ch>
In-Reply-To: <b694a433-8555-0eed-e38f-c15c0e2a6e98@lear.ch>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.56.21120200
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <567798F5E7519A4FB985F5A1341FC68E@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-12-06_03:2021-12-06, 2021-12-06 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=830 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2110150000 definitions=main-2112060093
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 5RMy7u8CktxQx1bEALIKLxoFoJCD0xbk
X-Proofpoint-GUID: 5RMy7u8CktxQx1bEALIKLxoFoJCD0xbk
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2021-12-06_05,2021-12-06_02,2021-12-02_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 clxscore=1011 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=829 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2110150000 definitions=main-2112060094
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/-I6zW3UFdS5nVaGN5CFe9K6T6zU>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Dec 2021 12:18:18 -0800
Subject: Re: [Ntp] [tsvwg] Antw: [EXT] Re: [Tsv‑art] Tsvart early review of draft‑ietf‑ntp‑alternative‑port‑02
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2021 14:55:50 -0000

>    Had neither NTP nor NTS existed, and you were requesting a new port for 
    a secure time protocol, would you have designed it identically?

Almost definitely not.  NTS is wrapped around into the quirks of NTP.