Re: [Ntp] [IANA-Port-Experts] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-ntp-alternative-port-02

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 07 December 2021 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66593A1805; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 10:58:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.701, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4spULwORp3S7; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 10:58:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE2E93A1800; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 10:58:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with ESMTP id 1B7GdL7m028912; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 18:57:47 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=ayXLj6m08CBoIhqmVTc10vaxkrwlycVxawzxx5h1JG4=; b=U1/uCJ1ztCR7ZIulb2mt8D3xpoRX31oljH0hmkw1kpb7oqJEXqa2Tmal9YESjy+nX6J2 NKYVYHXg4KZgp45lTepf9FLr56coaGfIAjHo945y62lDTGu6OmNRnb1/k12M3weKGjnN kTREthsgsBa8YUWiascRqXOdoDnKwn6GAqfaZWdee7fD7sjf2QsjKEeiLLSsz2VNnEa1 RpzKmwf4YaRiDPFgxzvbIEGScPEtW3DycbokZmgYKz+3P8vcbqIjZxRCyLXhJPbF+B5c nWaB5M1tzgm5h3fqeF7yGuiLCdtRdMyAiyWG+oTrzKbGrxq+mJf+mngS76Cqn+IPznE2 DA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint6 (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [184.51.33.61] (may be forged)) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3cssevqn7p-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 07 Dec 2021 18:57:47 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 1B7IqJcd031601; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 13:57:47 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.57]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3ctbnt83us-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 07 Dec 2021 13:57:46 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.26; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 13:57:46 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.026; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 13:57:46 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-ntp-alternative-port.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ntp-alternative-port.all@ietf.org>, tsv-art <tsv-art@ietf.org>, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "iana-port-experts@icann.org" <iana-port-experts@icann.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ntp] [IANA-Port-Experts] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-ntp-alternative-port-02
Thread-Index: AQHX6yq4/bMKkA/qPESbUaU0sBf+cqwnYk6A
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 18:57:45 +0000
Message-ID: <D4A9AB30-583A-478D-A81A-22F81220FE6D@akamai.com>
References: <163852890830.991.35615173535953832@ietfa.amsl.com> <309E0C66-CD9E-4951-B1B7-58C7581CF8B7@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <309E0C66-CD9E-4951-B1B7-58C7581CF8B7@strayalpha.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.56.21120200
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D4A9AB30583A478DA81A22F81220FE6Dakamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-12-07_07:2021-12-06, 2021-12-07 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=792 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2110150000 definitions=main-2112070117
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: gjY_utvSK6SpDsp1Y63pvNETQQg9iBlJ
X-Proofpoint-GUID: gjY_utvSK6SpDsp1Y63pvNETQQg9iBlJ
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2021-12-07_07,2021-12-06_02,2021-12-02_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=780 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2110150000 definitions=main-2112070118
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/UfeM0q_0xTNmWDQYRE3EhQ-jynM>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] [IANA-Port-Experts] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-ntp-alternative-port-02
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 18:58:19 -0000

  *   In the case here, NTP already supports in-band security negotiation - it is a non-protocol network configuration that is getting in the way. Using another port is a lazy (and unwarranted) way to resolve that problem.

I find this point of view compelling.  It’s a good example of an small focused group not necessarily seeing the larger picture.