IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Leap second draft

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Thu, 23 January 2020 23:04 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE851200BA for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:04:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vpab9MYkEIY3 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:03:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9E6C12008A for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:03:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id j26so193339ljc.12 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:03:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yLkqjWcT8lGHdZPVQIe8EUHpBsUGpXiBO26hBRLVOkw=; b=DoVrvB7kUUpgahh0Q7FxCpNWBlemeW99KFhvjbA9GIh+/77JQcs0zTiWFe6xrdWpsF QVQtxzK7/jtf70J+BFEiaGZP08+/OaHiSYTkhzJ13KzQwVOYh8RLmk5UP+q+AJmADwem +azwK6B7lXKLEaqp6bozp+lROyFGrzNC+Jikdsni44t0Ki1zDzDIvoeZfklOyez4bUqo uUpkbBAhUdRWeJESgzO4udp4c5MpDArpp1vSzEt4Vohe6ovDs85dwhfhK4rEgX5UB5nf 5AbWpzzQT80DCle5pl9xFhATCUUaTmQEgTHp1KnI15AkecePD6FHiOqDXJ5CyRM6TOEG n/wA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yLkqjWcT8lGHdZPVQIe8EUHpBsUGpXiBO26hBRLVOkw=; b=oDYbyW2gwVOWqIceyycGcVZFCRwvu6i0avuTc1qspZcLCdTTRC8UK+CmDV850a3mKS iIqrYhtjV2fj1mN58+llyXfdIHOWOLLw/ZOnl6r71aSLPt63cpUfdQ1xPwCUc3X7YBp4 G9AP99PVPFwGYg2ciKc3O/7FUtxOUGaY9LCRp+DZUEXUZe3W0uWRkR9OQiQFb57PVrjH AgIgw2ffdsfHe/u7JMIMNM5A6MFCJQ1tgN7tHeVzrUywjuTiJRTt8m7xAAsRYLVa18iG S2LclAkw+lXwsSA4yW896OOu5T2z4la6qW9QYmu5A+NS48z2iVsjHTsu+LRKlNNQYHGO RqyQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUmsZT0S6i78Qm3Li9V5RIsA21Aq/9YsyRFDq1H0qpVgjSBnS9Q Zk9n9884rfP8YaRBeDwOT96poS883CZmWeBSnCE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxIv2BrE7eHxIxTvdvrElK7sXLWjnzajSlPItQFoP0v1yhbYggLNi2E3ejKwlITMTqrr58374oNe/oInAiCWT4=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8188:: with SMTP id e8mr417409ljg.57.1579820637117; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:03:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJm83bD5Ozkpg5TpkogOW6xeeNQL3ZziLO9URM7haqN8Wrp=Wg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJm83bD5Ozkpg5TpkogOW6xeeNQL3ZziLO9URM7haqN8Wrp=Wg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:03:45 -0800
Message-ID: <CACsn0cmZkRifrnbVbPw2=9ww+ttmbAGCW39LhT+jhDLLyU8e+A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
Cc: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e26018059cd6a706"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/fLITcyxuFTGLt-h6ODncNHsSE-8>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Leap second draft
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 23:04:01 -0000

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019, 9:47 AM Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm writing up an I-D clarifying how NTP implementations are to behave
> in proximity to a leap second and also introducing an extension field
> that provides better leap-second-related information than is
> expressible using header fields alone, including giving the TAI-UTC
> offset.
>
> Karen, you mentioned a possible CfA for
> draft-stenn-ntp-extended-information if Harlan revises it to comply
> with RFC 7822 (-04 does not appear to comply). Our two drafts are
> partly redundant in purpose since they both provide TAI-UTC offset and
> we won't want to adopt both. Of course I think mine is the one we
> should adopt, but I'll strive to get a -00 submitted promptly so that
> they can be considered side-by-side without unduly delaying Harlan's
> CfA.
>

Apologies for the necromancy but someone at work just asked me which second
is repeated in an NTP timestamp and to make sure all our sources use the
right one.

This draft is needed.

>
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email