Re: [nvo3] Fwd: DRAFT Charter Update for Discussion

Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> Wed, 13 August 2014 23:39 UTC

Return-Path: <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5861A01AF for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.868
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.868 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3OaBvOlQF8IY for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9E2B1A014B for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BLF23455; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 23:39:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DFWEML706-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.225) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:39:15 +0100
Received: from DFWEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.50]) by dfweml706-chm ([10.193.5.225]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:39:10 -0700
From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
To: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>, "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [nvo3] Fwd: DRAFT Charter Update for Discussion
Thread-Index: AQHPty6mssbwkisIXUKu/EAdN5EkAZvPMC3w
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 23:39:11 +0000
Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F645DB3B26@dfweml701-chm.china.huawei.com>
References: <186E2FAA-E5C5-4828-8199-4EE71B5A5C1A@queuefull.net> <CAP4=VcgV0RtgqAw3kwQPrU92Pqn2K=0hzg1+MCMH=XdKqNiU_w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP4=VcgV0RtgqAw3kwQPrU92Pqn2K=0hzg1+MCMH=XdKqNiU_w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.157.188]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F645DB3B26dfweml701chmchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nvo3/lGoAsH1NuXjvKtV6WqRe2s9BOoI
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Fwd: DRAFT Charter Update for Discussion
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Network Virtualization Overlays \(NVO3\) Working Group" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nvo3/>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 23:39:22 -0000

Benson & Matthew,

The proposed charter is so general that there is not much to pick on. Yes, you have done a great job drafting it.

So the NVO3 is now DCVPN? Since the underlay is IP, will it become another L3VPN?

Linda

From: nvo3 [mailto:nvo3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benson Schliesser
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 2:42 PM
To: nvo3@ietf.org
Subject: [nvo3] Fwd: DRAFT Charter Update for Discussion

Just a reminder that Matthew and I are looking for feedback on the draft text of a new NVO3 charter. Can it be that we wrote a charter so perfect there are no comments..?

The draft charter text is quoted in my email below. For reference it can also be found at http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/nvo3/charter-ietf-nvo3-01-rev-20140808.txt

Cheers,
-Benson & Matthew


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net<mailto:bensons@queuefull.net>>
Date: Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 4:53 PM
Subject: DRAFT Charter Update for Discussion
To: nvo3@ietf.org<mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>


Dear NVO3 Contributors -

As discussed during the NVO3 meeting at IETF-90 in Toronto, the chairs have been drafting a new / revised charter for the WG. The latest draft charter text is below for your review.

Frankly, we suspect that some of the wording could be further improved to be more clear and/or precise. With that in mind we ask for your help - please let us know if something seems unclear or if you have suggestions for better wording.

If you have feedback please post it to the list for discussion within the next 2 weeks.

Thanks,
-Benson & Matthew

An NVO3 solution, also known as a Data Center Virtual Private Network (DCVPN),
is a set of protocols and/or protocol extensions that address the issues
described by draft-ietf-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement consistent with the
approach described by draft-ietf-nvo3-framework.

NVO3 will document DCVPN requirements for both control plane protocol(s) and
data plane encapsulation format(s), as well as management, operational,
maintenance, troubleshooting, security and OAM protocol requirements.
Additionally, NVO3 will document common use-cases for DCVPN solutions.

Consistent with the documents described above, the NVO3 WG will document an
architecture for DCVPNs within a data center environment based on the following
architectural design points:
-   A logically centralized NVA control plane
-   Support for an underlay IP data plane between NVEs

Based on this architecture the NVO3 WG will develop one or more NVO3 solutions.
This may include documenting applicability of existing protocols, contributing
to the development of protocol extensions by other WGs and/or SDOs, and/or
developing new protocols as appropriate.

Solutions and/or protocols that were developed outside of the IETF, but not
developed by another SDO, and that have multiple interoperable implementations
may be adopted by the NVO3 WG for further development, based on WG consensus,
if requested by the authors .

If the NVO3 WG anticipates the adoption of the technologies of another SDO,
such as the IEEE, as part of any DCVPN solution, it will liaise with that SDO
to ensure the compatibility of the approach.