Re: [nvo3] Fwd: DRAFT Charter Update for Discussion

Lucy yong <lucy.yong@huawei.com> Thu, 14 August 2014 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <lucy.yong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844FA1A0460 for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 09:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.868
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.868 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4WUJXOR4-_rJ for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 09:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 493761A03E7 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 09:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BLG74994; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:45:44 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DFWEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.72) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:45:43 +0100
Received: from DFWEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.50]) by dfweml702-chm.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.217]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 09:45:32 -0700
From: Lucy yong <lucy.yong@huawei.com>
To: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>, "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [nvo3] Fwd: DRAFT Charter Update for Discussion
Thread-Index: AQHPty6l71hXTd5nFkSDCKxTzbHUPZvQOR0A
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:45:32 +0000
Message-ID: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D453CCEBE@dfweml701-chm.china.huawei.com>
References: <186E2FAA-E5C5-4828-8199-4EE71B5A5C1A@queuefull.net> <CAP4=VcgV0RtgqAw3kwQPrU92Pqn2K=0hzg1+MCMH=XdKqNiU_w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP4=VcgV0RtgqAw3kwQPrU92Pqn2K=0hzg1+MCMH=XdKqNiU_w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.137.251]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D453CCEBEdfweml701chmchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nvo3/tnn4fdZKBGljrps_0h2252KCKBM
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Fwd: DRAFT Charter Update for Discussion
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Network Virtualization Overlays \(NVO3\) Working Group" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nvo3/>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:45:49 -0000

Hi Benson and Matthew,

The charter text is in general and good.

I suggest that the charter also includes the solutions for a virtual network, i.e. DCVPN, spanning multiple DCs and a virtual network interconnecting to another virtual network in DC(s) and an external network.

Thanks,
Lucy

From: nvo3 [mailto:nvo3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benson Schliesser
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 2:42 PM
To: nvo3@ietf.org
Subject: [nvo3] Fwd: DRAFT Charter Update for Discussion

Just a reminder that Matthew and I are looking for feedback on the draft text of a new NVO3 charter. Can it be that we wrote a charter so perfect there are no comments..?

The draft charter text is quoted in my email below. For reference it can also be found at http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/nvo3/charter-ietf-nvo3-01-rev-20140808.txt

Cheers,
-Benson & Matthew


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net<mailto:bensons@queuefull.net>>
Date: Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 4:53 PM
Subject: DRAFT Charter Update for Discussion
To: nvo3@ietf.org<mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>


Dear NVO3 Contributors -

As discussed during the NVO3 meeting at IETF-90 in Toronto, the chairs have been drafting a new / revised charter for the WG. The latest draft charter text is below for your review.

Frankly, we suspect that some of the wording could be further improved to be more clear and/or precise. With that in mind we ask for your help - please let us know if something seems unclear or if you have suggestions for better wording.

If you have feedback please post it to the list for discussion within the next 2 weeks.

Thanks,
-Benson & Matthew

An NVO3 solution, also known as a Data Center Virtual Private Network (DCVPN),
is a set of protocols and/or protocol extensions that address the issues
described by draft-ietf-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement consistent with the
approach described by draft-ietf-nvo3-framework.

NVO3 will document DCVPN requirements for both control plane protocol(s) and
data plane encapsulation format(s), as well as management, operational,
maintenance, troubleshooting, security and OAM protocol requirements.
Additionally, NVO3 will document common use-cases for DCVPN solutions.

Consistent with the documents described above, the NVO3 WG will document an
architecture for DCVPNs within a data center environment based on the following
architectural design points:
-   A logically centralized NVA control plane
-   Support for an underlay IP data plane between NVEs

Based on this architecture the NVO3 WG will develop one or more NVO3 solutions.
This may include documenting applicability of existing protocols, contributing
to the development of protocol extensions by other WGs and/or SDOs, and/or
developing new protocols as appropriate.

Solutions and/or protocols that were developed outside of the IETF, but not
developed by another SDO, and that have multiple interoperable implementations
may be adopted by the NVO3 WG for further development, based on WG consensus,
if requested by the authors .

If the NVO3 WG anticipates the adoption of the technologies of another SDO,
such as the IEEE, as part of any DCVPN solution, it will liaise with that SDO
to ensure the compatibility of the approach.