IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ogpx] A blog post from the HTML5/Websocket wars worth reading

Barry Leiba <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com> Thu, 18 February 2010 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223713A7FC2 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:17:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.836
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.836 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.237, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 257dIrl4lGHu for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:17:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com (mail-fx0-f218.google.com [209.85.220.218]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78213A7FC6 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:17:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so9080204fxm.29 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:18:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lLZXOLb1HZW2bE5nngXIhZqiFEfXMzK++iqPqlpIfVI=; b=nnobEIxwnbUohN86KwYij1vTqgk8yjjrroE7RoWw6GBOXK05pKcajHhR18JVQ5JZIQ C0wOhetegZZwX5eAGmGCV59BHUMBU5LWWL06jPo7lzdybZEC4TtTZGiuMFDtUfnHcNAo dbNQavzEV5frH1J6aFm5jEW1Zm45i18lYZaJo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Q5tMdEPx/zWWCXelSdzX5PhDuWLFFBmoF+N31WssoXgvuiFI/1I3UmQVcrQz9lzB3Y prv4Q6mcYgl2xTMcids/YMF65RyB6VdDWOBdWOd2dh+ikg4Nmq3GbCnqBR7tHjAig49n Ua06F65boNU6q349o4qKc0pBDVG3/7xbBJzVw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.5.212 with SMTP id 20mr5345227faw.19.1266513522368; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:18:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <e0b04bba1002180129if2eeabv5eb7f7db76bfaf1d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <OFE468F9B5.25216572-ON852576CD.0053ADC1-852576CD.0053E11E@us.ibm.com> <382d73da1002170836x3c689a89ve5e62a67e6173bdc@mail.gmail.com> <OF7F0480B9.5C99B16B-ON852576CD.00623CB9-852576CD.006335DE@us.ibm.com> <e0b04bba1002180129if2eeabv5eb7f7db76bfaf1d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:18:42 -0500
Message-ID: <6c9fcc2a1002180918p2bf40959v32a1163848c76717@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
To: ogpx@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [ogpx] A blog post from the HTML5/Websocket wars worth reading
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: barryleiba@computer.org
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:17:04 -0000

> VWRAP is not a protocol to enshrine a particular form of world, but a
> protocol to define a particular form of interop.  We often make the mistake
> of referring to "SL-like worlds" in these discussions, when what we really
> mean is "VWRAP-compatible worlds".  There is certainly no need to be SL-like
> nor even SL-compatible when using VWRAP.  For example, VWRAP will
> undoubtedly be used by leading-edge worlds with services and assets that
> Linden Lab chooses not to handle, as a business choice.
>
> Therefore "SL-like" is a very incorrect phrase here.  We mean
> VWRAP-compatible.

What she said.

Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email