Re: [ogpx] A blog post from the HTML5/Websocket wars worth reading

Kari Lippert <kari.lippert@gmail.com> Wed, 17 February 2010 16:35 UTC

Return-Path: <kari.lippert@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB113A736F for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:35:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kjj2PljHXjtq for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:35:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ew0-f216.google.com (mail-ew0-f216.google.com [209.85.219.216]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD993A7353 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:35:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so8447659ewy.29 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:36:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4x6lOXdIhNFmZN0XAVTh+KGfLbAc1FUjDyJW+RwpWAY=; b=svgpkAHt8tbx2UH7Vbts3TkXI6A5UJvlgN3ipovPaURIPK6gaXyhlD7308i8xQ8ncc 6Tvs1PnxBaxLqiNayX8G2Q+puzF1kacdjo+KNmp9ITpWOw40R5Saug1IsDPHUohQWZ/6 QnV5rrZ/9HQlu6zR9unnXsxCtnxbxeZQbE+qM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=geHl/DB0YpO5WRm+V22IuOYclGLONOYErGk8u96hAtI/fYNOgTuvsRJoHRD/l05yuE Ro2/oIC8380wX5whZmE1e5z7tF/3GdZL0Ky7d7esp+zi6Z/fXFlnIp63JM7pwWaNkbb/ fgaXgjjN+ypsWkjgBkIJiDUn5WonTjxfeLJe4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.90.5 with SMTP id d5mr711325wef.147.1266424615809; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:36:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <OFE468F9B5.25216572-ON852576CD.0053ADC1-852576CD.0053E11E@us.ibm.com>
References: <OFE468F9B5.25216572-ON852576CD.0053ADC1-852576CD.0053E11E@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:36:55 -0500
Message-ID: <382d73da1002170836x3c689a89ve5e62a67e6173bdc@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kari Lippert <kari.lippert@gmail.com>
To: David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com>, ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e6d784585c42f6047fce75e0"
Subject: Re: [ogpx] A blog post from the HTML5/Websocket wars worth reading
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:35:19 -0000

Oh my, thanks for sharing... yes, I see some similarities too... but I think
in the case of VWRAP, we are obliged to provide the protocol and also the
"object(s)" including the semantics and intended interpretation. If it is
rich enough, the future will be able to happen from within. And it the past
is any indication, through thoughtful re-purposing of things well defined!

Kari


On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:16 AM, David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com> wrote:

>
> For those who don't slog through the Hybi/Websocket traffic a
> blog entry from Tim Bray which I think touches on some issues
> for the VWRAP work...
>
> *http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2010/02/15/HTML5*<http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2010/02/15/HTML5>
>
> - David
> ~ Zha
>
> _______________________________________________
> ogpx mailing list
> ogpx@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx
>
>


-- 


http://kjlippert.wordpress.com/
http://community.webshots.com/user/MissGnomer