[ogpx] Feedback to draft-hamrick-vwrap-authentication-00.txt
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> Sat, 06 March 2010 14:26 UTC
Return-Path: <carlo@alinoe.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E413A8B2F for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 06:26:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.43
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.43 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mkVDL1sCffYJ for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 06:26:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from viefep13-int.chello.at (viefep13-int.chello.at [62.179.121.33]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76FB3A7EBD for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 06:26:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from edge01.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.236]) by viefep13-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.02.00 201-2260-120-20100118) with ESMTP id <20100306142609.JUMD8754.viefep13-int.chello.at@edge01.upcmail.net> for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:26:09 +0100
Received: from mail9.alinoe.com ([77.250.43.12]) by edge01.upcmail.net with edge id pqS71d07A0FlQed01qS8qB; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:26:09 +0100
X-SourceIP: 77.250.43.12
Received: from carlo by mail9.alinoe.com with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <carlo@alinoe.com>) id 1NnuxD-0006zV-D0 for ogpx@ietf.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:26:07 +0100
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:26:07 +0100
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: ogpx@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20100306142607.GB24621@alinoe.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=vnqI19KPXCji1IvME9db5F0e05beLnpw0BpKFqCD4U0= c=1 sm=0 a=m4l3xkCbDjwA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=BjFOTwK7AAAA:8 a=2WZCs8Fz0elgawVGwo4A:9 a=3gOLiNl2viy-POXS_KgA:7 a=PJLOwdr6npBpmCQgk1XZFFsCpHMA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=bW3kdApBr58A:10 a=vKwqw8CzkGAw0NjU:21 a=zdYhOGZy1vkHhkCd:21 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117
Subject: [ogpx] Feedback to draft-hamrick-vwrap-authentication-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:26:10 -0000
2.3.1. Agent Identifier 2.3.2. Account Identifier These paragraphs (and possibly further on in the document) refer to a first_name and last_name that together identity an agent. The very word 'name', certainly in combination with 'first' and 'last', strongly suggest that these two are sequences of octets from a restricted set, most notably, that they should not contain unprintable characters, punctuation or spaces. * What is missing the definition of what characters each name may be made up of, and what are the maximum lengths that need to be supported. Moreover, if first_name and last_name may not contain a space, and if neither makes ever sense to be used alone (which is the case imho), it is not really the business of VWRAP to deal with first_name and last_name separately. Instead one can simply define an opaque sequence of octets representing the "Agent Identifier", which in practise might or might not be "first_name last_name" (separated by a space). * I miss the point that makes it necessary to take the Agent Identifier apart into two not further defined strings. Note that if a client application wishes to make an explicit difference between the "first name" and "last name" part, for example by using two separate input fields when the user has to input them, then it can still do so, and catenate the two before sending it to the agent domain. 1. I propose to remove the notion of "first and last names" from the VWRAP documents. And only speak about Agent Identifier (a single sequence of octets), and Account Identifier (likewise). 2. Maximum length and the characters that need to be supported should be defined in the document. Finally, note that if Second Life (tm) requires a First and Last name string internally, they can still have those: The Agent Identifier is generated by Linden Lab, they can enforce that it exists of two names separated by a space. So, it would be minor/small change to accept a single string in the authentication protocol and than separate that again into two tokens upon receipt. -- Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
- [ogpx] Feedback to draft-hamrick-vwrap-authentica… Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] Feedback to draft-hamrick-vwrap-authen… Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] Feedback to draft-hamrick-vwrap-authen… Carlo Wood
- [ogpx] Fwd: Re: Feedback to draft-hamrick-vwrap-a… Meadhbh Hamrick
- Re: [ogpx] Feedback to draft-hamrick-vwrap-authen… Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] Feedback to draft-hamrick-vwrap-authen… Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] Feedback to draft-hamrick-vwrap-authen… Morgaine
- [ogpx] Updated draft of draft-levine-vwrap-client… David W Levine
- [ogpx] Names, Identity and Protocol elements David W Levine
- Re: [ogpx] Names, Identity and Protocol elements Morgaine