IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] Call for adoption of draft-gallagher-openpgp-replacementkey

Andrew Gallagher <andrewg@andrewg.com> Sun, 07 April 2024 19:15 UTC

Return-Path: <andrewg@andrewg.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BED8C14F600 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 12:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=andrewg.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rHpjn6ogmCJr for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 12:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fum.andrewg.com (fum.andrewg.com [135.181.198.78]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0B8DC14F614 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 12:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=andrewg.com; s=andrewg-com; t=1712517326; bh=5b/cyGVTCFB461MqjGvLo9uw4WAfhTGRYrrfDcPFYxE=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:From; b=n/BB6/hd+j7iAyLmEC1VwpRTMwje9VwNe9LqPrHOE9s7yAawRv6D4dRvBV+/p82uX +i8s1YTI+EGlJANGOuYj3PcMMCzYgMXtVFSxoVS40itaPUIYV+fPG5xPt5tfLZZWaL iyvjnGB71ti+iRjDissVURRCOo5t0USc9s9x+l+pQhjX4cAzylOtgPfT1BwexTEXMB EdIJ8oe4+SLNMpY987fHO7ez3QHM0k/XWXtx9w0B2svLn9/3O7YwgYbJWikEOSwBzV ZFfCjGfGf5nmWOdV4IkHIkQk/pDAqCYCeqPRbK4NcK3O8v/93IzMfgHLsoPjqxmxcS 0hbVTTQBbOJ1g==
Received: from smtpclient.apple (serenity [IPv6:fc93:5820:7349:eda2:99a7::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by fum.andrewg.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35D155DE33; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 19:15:26 +0000 (UTC)
From: Andrew Gallagher <andrewg@andrewg.com>
Message-Id: <00E3FD5F-F5DE-4B85-A34D-E3E12EFD5DB7@andrewg.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F22A3C0E-9CE3-484C-B75E-B9C853401C73"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6.1.1\))
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 20:15:10 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87edbhqdof.fsf@kaka.sjd.se>
Cc: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, IETF OpenPGP WG <openpgp@ietf.org>
To: Simon Josefsson <simon=40josefsson.org@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <87ttkdr5e0.fsf@kaka.sjd.se> <F0D472E0-0B37-416A-9587-F64FF646B0E1@andrewg.com> <87plv1r2sf.fsf@kaka.sjd.se> <874jcdi0em.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <87edbhqdof.fsf@kaka.sjd.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/ZirzsP943lidQm-ir5Kh9YElj_E>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Call for adoption of draft-gallagher-openpgp-replacementkey
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 19:15:34 -0000

On 7 Apr 2024, at 18:34, Simon Josefsson <simon=40josefsson.org@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Is this intended to replace or augment human-written key transition statements?

Yes.

> Doing so would be useful, and
> quite important to ease key roll-over to PQC keys, but transition
> statements are usually not published when keys are expired or revoked.

Indeed, this subpacket gives a key owner the means to make such a transition statement in machine-readable form, and distribute it through the customary key update mechanisms.

A

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email