IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] Call for adoption of draft-gallagher-openpgp-replacementkey

Andrew Gallagher <andrewg@andrewg.com> Sun, 07 April 2024 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <andrewg@andrewg.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40220C14F602 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 10:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=andrewg.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K_EoBnnyrQ2T for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 10:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fum.andrewg.com (fum.andrewg.com [135.181.198.78]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B006C14F5F1 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 10:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=andrewg.com; s=andrewg-com; t=1712510742; bh=3AVerokm4zeTuSGbbIALgVCS5L7wRVtkTwUWKxDKlIk=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:From; b=M9+JhBmbdsTmgLa81G03Wh9jBsbBIUCfFBQrLf7UpdMbn/ParSPAig7N74jrA2Wqr UIF+1J8O0gGQJpdJiGSsZFPoD193wYDNl2L+he57V9Og6eEsHfgFp5cdCUTq18RbBT 3YUubWgFlBuXwGE3YSZt2Okc1RFmsXlklcS6tnQxZKvE/uvq1NeLV0tdLRd0osIEy1 7rUAFS6MM/BaR1FohUEXxp2WU8+PoJmuDNp4Vu015XRU+XoqLdueXzp0THFt4VnriQ HJwB5fG5AZTHpYdusGp5DhC/Fj4KF9zWB8sJDLROJY0RoG564sOLK5G3+M9I933E20 ZShjPhIMw2zKQ==
Received: from smtpclient.apple (serenity [IPv6:fc93:5820:7349:eda2:99a7::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by fum.andrewg.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 529B45DE4F; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 17:25:42 +0000 (UTC)
From: Andrew Gallagher <andrewg@andrewg.com>
Message-Id: <35059632-B282-455A-9CBB-980C7152C894@andrewg.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C5AAD48F-3937-4BAD-972A-2042054F6F8A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6.1.1\))
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 18:25:24 +0100
In-Reply-To: <874jcdi0em.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
Cc: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>, openpgp@ietf.org
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
References: <87ttkdr5e0.fsf@kaka.sjd.se> <F0D472E0-0B37-416A-9587-F64FF646B0E1@andrewg.com> <87plv1r2sf.fsf@kaka.sjd.se> <874jcdi0em.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/LC2ZW-UDGrO4MIkd3efkDOVE0WI>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Call for adoption of draft-gallagher-openpgp-replacementkey
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 17:25:50 -0000

On 7 Apr 2024, at 17:48, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> 
> Incorporating some of the motivating text from Andrew into the
> introduction would also be useful.
> 
> Andrew, Daphne, do you think the draft could accomodate those kinds of
> additions if the working group were to adopt it?

I would be willing to add some of the previously discussed workflows to the document if this helps to clarify the intent and usage of the subpacket.

A

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email