[openpgp] Re: Call for adoption of draft-gallagher-openpgp-replacementkey

Andrew Gallagher <andrewg@andrewg.com> Mon, 08 July 2024 21:32 UTC

Return-Path: <andrewg@andrewg.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4578C22EF16 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 14:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=andrewg.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dWTPk7OlNVvh for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 14:32:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fum.andrewg.com (fum.andrewg.com [IPv6:2a01:4f9:c011:23ad::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58452C2143F4 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 14:32:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=andrewg.com; s=andrewg-com; t=1720474328; bh=t5SEuqn5tMq97BKTYY0IyqJgAjGNm3rfLuwJcuXvS/U=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=GlqBA+pdjpYkDjeqisKrENkgu14JgXwx22lUw9tgM9cByRzBp7OzCUQDCNVpsWBGQ 0pBIyGgewD8+2Gg2efQEkJ9wA2+AIs5feAAusfkRcDzS6qhVepANI5TKOztlgDNMGC lrbkqUB06E1yBmDwLwlNmERRQndsi13IDfjD7HSTyRkbxPkhcFHkJ+79eFFSYlGyka B47s7naxGI7Tc2rEqeta+XcDqb6y2It9nu511PGSvxZe+XRlg2DiTAAZZoKpAdUu3U G2dOtbzPRLp3juSmAhAFmdesP4dgcWNzX+n7M1ek4l04fGzMNw61s+xL1qJaFIs6QP hl32rc3yo+zSg==
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [80.233.63.23]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by fum.andrewg.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D52CB5DCAF; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 21:32:07 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Andrew Gallagher <andrewg@andrewg.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2024 23:31:55 +0200
Message-Id: <F9C7A809-5BB1-45E6-AB86-741B0135F125@andrewg.com>
References: <f88593ef-0fd9-4f6b-8dd3-cb67da9e2ef2@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <f88593ef-0fd9-4f6b-8dd3-cb67da9e2ef2@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21F90)
Message-ID-Hash: 3NGSU5CPLWEPSU6FZJOA4XZRQFGWJSOL
X-Message-ID-Hash: 3NGSU5CPLWEPSU6FZJOA4XZRQFGWJSOL
X-MailFrom: andrewg@andrewg.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-openpgp.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [openpgp] Re: Call for adoption of draft-gallagher-openpgp-replacementkey
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/UWn9Gdq-ICug59cSRNNT4S-EebQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:openpgp-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:openpgp-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:openpgp-leave@ietf.org>

On 8 Jul 2024, at 23:14, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
>> if you can emit draft-ietf-openpgp-replacement-key
>> replacing this one in the next hour or two great. If not, we can ask our
>> AD to approve publication after the cutoff.
> 

Hi, Stephen. 

Thanks, but I’m AFK for two weeks. I can update as soon as I get back. 

A