Re: [OSPF] OSPF Link Overload - draft-hegde-ospf-link-overload-01

"Ahmed Bashandy (bashandy)" <bashandy@cisco.com> Tue, 29 September 2015 12:38 UTC

Return-Path: <bashandy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACAA1B3818 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 05:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XxK0a15M2f_X for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 05:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C160D1B3809 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 05:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=585; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1443530327; x=1444739927; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ynEMi2C/6H4n4yLUGRfzpFr3W1zC5Y5z0skYD8aoqnY=; b=RV5fHaI2gRyuQG7/6cQSVB7ulpiSSKDDKS6nZoF/VW1qeM1f7wPy6lc7 8M4k5RkyO/Sr4JXL66WXoXXsayIfemQut5xR/wI79foSSF9MFwiMq82Vi 37k4jz19WE+Psi4elRF0sfkdGxBfXmWSvveDxXLZ7Il/hvCLa8SDts93S Y=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,608,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="192256063"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 29 Sep 2015 12:38:47 +0000
Received: from [10.24.47.178] ([10.24.47.178]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t8TCcjW8023076; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 12:38:46 GMT
Message-ID: <560A8659.1000006@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 05:38:49 -0700
From: "Ahmed Bashandy (bashandy)" <bashandy@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
References: <D22B605B.32E55%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D22B605B.32E55%acee@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/DpaJjCtUdW0ff-Tb25738GG0sCo>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF Link Overload - draft-hegde-ospf-link-overload-01
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 12:38:53 -0000

Support

Ahmed

On 9/25/2015 5:34 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> In Prague, there was consensus in the room that this use case was not
> covered by existing mechanisms and that it was a problem the WG should
> solve. There were differing opinions as to the exact solution but that
> should not preclude OSPF WG adoption.
>
> Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG
> Document.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf