Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?

"weiqiang cheng" <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> Thu, 23 April 2015 01:59 UTC

Return-Path: <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB53A1A0069 for <pals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RELAY_IS_221=2.222, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8RM8ZMlJSh49 for <pals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta3.chinamobile.com (cmccmta3.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 78E501A005F for <pals@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.15]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app09-12009 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee9553851e90e3-e756a; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:59:06 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee9553851e90e3-e756a
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmccPC (unknown[125.35.9.8]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr08-12008 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee8553851e94bc-99bd2; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:59:06 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee8553851e94bc-99bd2
From: weiqiang cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
To: stbryant@cisco.com, pals@ietf.org
References: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:59:06 +0800
Message-ID: <00ef01d07d69$14c928f0$3e5b7ad0$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdB21iDaSNNCkwNyRKi7L6zykxta2QGku70A
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/4lAcP1LdWN9hihDpHEMptQBRkz0>
Cc: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org, pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 01:59:22 -0000

Support.

-----Original Message-----
From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 1:12 AM
To: pals@ietf.org
Cc: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?

This is to start a two week WG poll to determine whether
we should adopt

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon-03

This poll will close on  29th April 2015

- Stewart

_______________________________________________
Pals mailing list
Pals@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals