IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Fri, 01 May 2015 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE59E1AD377 for <pals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 May 2015 07:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l_3HRLcp7iAi for <pals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 May 2015 07:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6954A1A9035 for <pals@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 May 2015 07:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=423; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1430491677; x=1431701277; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RbRiHNRxc5MWurt7IsHJ9buKS2+zh6lp7VQKU4Xb7lg=; b=C4YVgeIb6MdOp/X2E2QNwKputjEd3/w6APkPgoRjZwciJ03lLhMNj2bw Z2UKtW+JiahgkTy7GKPnTJkCtixo1imXgkQ05U+kpS9oMzF7/dU77gOQx dxbPNJa4HUO7se05su0mcuiClV4796e9V5D5wCQJOn9xxNz5x7Flfp+H2 4=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,350,1427760000"; d="scan'208";a="457837489"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 May 2015 14:47:55 +0000
Received: from [10.55.98.187] (ams-stbryant-88110.cisco.com [10.55.98.187]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t41Elt2l017164; Fri, 1 May 2015 14:47:55 GMT
Message-ID: <5543921B.9050200@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 15:47:55 +0100
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "pals@ietf.org" <pals@ietf.org>
References: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/skRKyZP0N1NkiDpm8gLwte2_TGI>
Cc: "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" <draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 14:47:59 -0000

On 14/04/2015 18:11, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> This is to start a two week WG poll to determine whether
> we should adopt
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon-03
>
> This poll will close on  29th April 2015
>
> - Stewart
> .
>
Clearly we have interest in this draft and should therefore
adopt it.

Please republish as draft-ietf-pals-mc-pon-00

I have pre-approved the draft.

- Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email