IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?

"Yemin (Amy)" <amy.yemin@huawei.com> Thu, 16 April 2015 03:40 UTC

Return-Path: <amy.yemin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1BA1B2E92 for <pals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w5uRqPm4-jvQ for <pals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2ACF1B2E8D for <pals@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BUX74379; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:39:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.72) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 04:39:57 +0100
Received: from SZXEMA506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.68]) by SZXEMA413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.72]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:39:53 +0800
From: "Yemin (Amy)" <amy.yemin@huawei.com>
To: "stbryant@cisco.com" <stbryant@cisco.com>, "pals@ietf.org" <pals@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?
Thread-Index: AQHQdtYilK9rKSBZkESmN//9kSw6bp1O/0Bg
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:39:52 +0000
Message-ID: <9C5FD3EFA72E1740A3D41BADDE0B461F8F404290@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.169.33.63]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/libcJlRkF93VU9fmprvB72-GVY4>
Cc: "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" <draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:40:02 -0000

Support.
PON is widely deployment in the network, it's useful to have such an protection extension. 

BR,
Amy

-----Original Message-----
From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 1:12 AM
To: pals@ietf.org
Cc: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?

This is to start a two week WG poll to determine whether we should adopt

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon-03

This poll will close on  29th April 2015

- Stewart

_______________________________________________
Pals mailing list
Pals@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email