[Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Tue, 14 April 2015 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200A21A014D for <pals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nc8jNQzkwuKk for <pals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21E7C1A0130 for <pals@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=190; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429031516; x=1430241116; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject: content-transfer-encoding; bh=4BLy6ghifutOFOP5ix8YYLji80iwx6EHE3iQhOQKAc0=; b=dTrl/vhwaE0FhRSN1qUCYYZ0N7pXme0O9IknVxL6l2sOX1yBNXY6GlOK 6Jk2PUxPRsl3cL+Gu0qMjaU2xGApyiy3g9YnqM+FaVNT5nFsU5cWIRCl4 txKQafvVAQBo7a7KWz9ZuVdDONtF/zG7nxwvBPVVxkU81yM3ld+ssivA5 4=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,576,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="427210455"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Apr 2015 17:11:54 +0000
Received: from [10.55.98.187] (ams-stbryant-88110.cisco.com [10.55.98.187]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3EHBsJR005665; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:11:54 GMT
Message-ID: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 18:11:54 +0100
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "pals@ietf.org" <pals@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/4tbQlW3LQoHoVTQLgyMUJl4mxEA>
Cc: "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" <draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:12:00 -0000

This is to start a two week WG poll to determine whether
we should adopt

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon-03

This poll will close on  29th April 2015

- Stewart