IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?

Yimin Shen <yshen@juniper.net> Mon, 27 April 2015 13:05 UTC

Return-Path: <yshen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA461B3173 for <pals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 06:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HkhM1YZfLnk3 for <pals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 06:05:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0115.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2226F1B3179 for <pals@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 06:05:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BY2PR0501MB1815.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.163.155.145) by BY2PR0501MB1814.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.163.155.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.148.16; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:05:18 +0000
Received: from BY2PR0501MB1813.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.163.155.143) by BY2PR0501MB1815.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.163.155.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.148.16; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:05:16 +0000
Received: from BY2PR0501MB1813.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.163.155.143]) by BY2PR0501MB1813.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.163.155.143]) with mapi id 15.01.0148.008; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:05:16 +0000
From: Yimin Shen <yshen@juniper.net>
To: "stbryant@cisco.com" <stbryant@cisco.com>, "pals@ietf.org" <pals@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?
Thread-Index: AQHQdtYi/SpmLzsk3UqFUT6Rlx+1SJ1g56Ew
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:05:16 +0000
Message-ID: <BY2PR0501MB1813CD2B83FCF90BE768087BBDE90@BY2PR0501MB1813.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <552D4A5A.1000209@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: cisco.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14]
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR0501MB1815; UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR0501MB1814;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY2PR0501MB18157922BC876A681D248F43BDE90@BY2PR0501MB1815.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-antispam-report: BMV:1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(13464003)(377454003)(164054003)(46102003)(62966003)(54356999)(50986999)(2900100001)(19580405001)(106116001)(74316001)(230783001)(76576001)(99286002)(2950100001)(40100003)(102836002)(5001770100001)(76176999)(77156002)(15975445007)(122556002)(86362001)(2501003)(92566002)(66066001)(87936001)(19580395003)(2656002)(33656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR0501MB1815; H:BY2PR0501MB1813.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(5002010)(3002001); SRVR:BY2PR0501MB1815; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR0501MB1815;
x-forefront-prvs: 0559FB9674
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Apr 2015 13:05:16.5475 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR0501MB1815
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/xLDiS10PFfp1y139Rmu3_Lhd2EA>
Cc: "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" <draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:05:29 -0000

Support the adoption, as a co-auther.


Thanks,

/Yimin Shen


-----Original Message-----
From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 1:12 PM
To: pals@ietf.org
Cc: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?

This is to start a two week WG poll to determine whether we should adopt

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon-03

This poll will close on  29th April 2015

- Stewart

_______________________________________________
Pals mailing list
Pals@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email