IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pals] 答复: Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?

Puyun <puyun@huawei.com> Thu, 16 April 2015 08:37 UTC

Return-Path: <puyun@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E4D1B2C39 for <pals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 01:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.078
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.078 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SgPb4m64x1XZ for <pals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 01:37:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C3B51B2C38 for <pals@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 01:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BUY00961; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:37:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.72) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:37:51 +0100
Received: from SZXEMA501-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.31]) by SZXEMA413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.72]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 16:37:46 +0800
From: Puyun <puyun@huawei.com>
To: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>, "Mallette, Edwin J." <Edwin.Mallette@mybrighthouse.com>, "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" <stbryant@cisco.com>, "pals@ietf.org" <pals@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?
Thread-Index: AQHQd5vJ24cno6JAQUGK+uCoV3fso51N2ZEAgAF4XVA=
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:37:46 +0000
Message-ID: <A811AC6DCC5A5540A74766974361DEEA86F86830@SZXEMA501-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <D1540E1D.7C146%edwin.mallette@mybrighthouse.com> <9BD98921-2C05-4EB6-B0C4-8983A41976CF@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <9BD98921-2C05-4EB6-B0C4-8983A41976CF@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.146.78.176]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/Ad529Rk4P0XDeZ23HQAPzX-OueA>
Cc: "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" <draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [Pals] 答复: Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:37:57 -0000

Support


-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
发送时间: 2015年4月16日 2:10
收件人: Mallette, Edwin J.; Stewart Bryant (stbryant); pals@ietf.org
抄送: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org
主题: Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?

Support.

-- 
Cheers,
Rajiv 







-----Original Message-----
From: <Mallette>, "Edwin J."
Date: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 at 12:46 PM
To: "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)", "pals@ietf.org"
Cc: "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org", "pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [Pals] Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?

>Support as co-author.
>
>Ed
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stbryant@cisco.com]
>>Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 1:12 AM
>>To: pals@ietf.org
>>Cc: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org; pals-chairs@tools.ietf.org
>>Subject: Should the PALS WG adopt draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon?
>>
>>This is to start a two week WG poll to determine whether
>>we should adopt
>>
>>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon-03
>>
>>This poll will close on  29th April 2015
>>
>>- Stewart
>>_______________________________________________
>>Pals mailing list
>>Pals@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals
>
>
>________________________________
>
>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain information that is 
>privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. **If you 
>are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender 
>immediately by return e-mail, purge it and do not disseminate or copy it.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Pals mailing list
>Pals@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals
_______________________________________________
Pals mailing list
Pals@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email