IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 18 February 2021 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1452C3A13F9 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 07:57:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.894
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAY_BE_FORGED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3zBzkT-PneMg for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 07:57:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96A883A13F5 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 07:57:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 11IFvPCP008971; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:57:25 GMT
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9020C2203C; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:57:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A70D2203A; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:57:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (81-174-207-249.bbplus.pte-ag2.dyn.plus.net [81.174.207.249] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 11IFvMVr025982 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:57:23 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Dhruv Dhody' <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, pce@ietf.org
References: <CAP7zK5YxLUw_TvG-EBQXSfMcYUaeck+FZ=8o9+fbxJW=v59teA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5YxLUw_TvG-EBQXSfMcYUaeck+FZ=8o9+fbxJW=v59teA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:57:22 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <06a301d7060e$bf285800$3d790800$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQIAdROQF0GBhi2g+pZtFSO0/U56OqoLMv3A
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 81.174.207.249
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25942.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--4.675-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--4.675-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25942.003
X-TMASE-Result: 10--4.675300-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: u7Yf2n7Ca/3xIbpQ8BhdbI61Z+HJnvsOS/ceBQrgS1EIHDaYRY4AXhUl FfwzsqyWuKTjN0p21rFWIZbbBMWa5fnVY0DWsTq3sgYw1+LBrk1SDnPEI8clbfIbTI2Z+6CqVv2 nq/Ij4oLKa8g2BCeDWb9nk9YaLJ/gQdzc6QthYzW20BbG4zmyXoKOU2QQsGo0d5V6s5WjhCtUza n9xEPKMWP5D2Y/liXWQrdYRvkIyHBOxzeg8qHiCnpRh12Siy9ray49w8WASDcvfU/riSJXkaxlG /oyG2KcpgPncuL7qROQKl4RwWngiuVHGbcDbAq6OX/V8P8ail3InWAWA4yE6V3nc39MdH3hDMq3 z/Y/gtUnRE+fI6etkpqUMnUo2e5/lvFbSx/OgC/b+f2zKUE5MvGEwV22POdTnOXP+rF0aFa/ueD YIiuJqfQqDvs2snz2WfYCpmPVrbsYRoReuQZUI03+9BzFCkVzNAW83zYDw/v1OlCIPxKfizngMR AgrdeEyfkWaeG5p9A=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/-G1J23Xhu6--LMEB18KPlSWHUkw>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:57:34 -0000

Thanks to the authors for cleaning this up a lot since last time.

I don't object to adoption. Would be nice to have evidence of someone
needing a bit now, but by the time this becomes an RFC it is reasonably
possible.

Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: Pce <pce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: 01 February 2021 17:48
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03

Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03

This is a small draft that extends the flags in the LSP Objects by
defining a new LSP-EXTENDED-FLAG TLV. Note that the existing
sub-registry "LSP Object Flag Field" is almost fully assigned.

https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#lsp-object-flag-field

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons
- Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are
you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to
the list.

Please respond by Monday 15th Feb.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email