IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03

"Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com> Wed, 03 February 2021 13:09 UTC

Return-Path: <c.l@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFD63A085E for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 05:09:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NPLjA-hRdaMy for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 05:09:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 150C13A0858 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 05:09:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml744-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4DW23f1xJVz67kbc for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 21:05:34 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml744-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.225) by fraeml744-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.225) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 14:09:04 +0100
Received: from DGGEML423-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.40) by fraeml744-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.225) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.2106.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 14:09:04 +0100
Received: from DGGEML529-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.17]) by dggeml423-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.199.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0509.000; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 21:09:02 +0800
From: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03
Thread-Index: AQHW+MKB6x3TGgLVX0yjnydN8mjWwKpGabpw
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 13:09:01 +0000
Message-ID: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02E08802@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <CAP7zK5YxLUw_TvG-EBQXSfMcYUaeck+FZ=8o9+fbxJW=v59teA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5YxLUw_TvG-EBQXSfMcYUaeck+FZ=8o9+fbxJW=v59teA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.179.144]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/atsE5iPm0JOUDC8wNMf3zUP1ixk>
Subject: [Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 13:09:10 -0000

Yes, support. This document can addresses the issue of running out the flag bits.

Thanks to the author!
Cheng
 




-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Dhruv Dhody
发送时间: 2021年2月2日 1:48
收件人: pce@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03

Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03

This is a small draft that extends the flags in the LSP Objects by defining a new LSP-EXTENDED-FLAG TLV. Note that the existing sub-registry "LSP Object Flag Field" is almost fully assigned.

https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#lsp-object-flag-field

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons
- Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

Please respond by Monday 15th Feb.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email