IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03

Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> Thu, 18 February 2021 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F6D3A129C for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:27:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cFvzXIFMfX6j for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:27:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 092B63A129D for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:27:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id lw17so2924620pjb.0 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:27:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FWGFyY3Z9heFTMLnCkSx53cuTFFaq1TFH4FLopVqzNA=; b=JLkhu77QX74988rs+cLQyWbh7yxYXRU4F7wBo3zA6ob0Ckp2MyLWXv9NApGuJpvH90 Bse6Vodv8l+DZIq97wwUwepoF09c39g3zptlzAQcUNnrU/yRbeBcuXcxkIz+fjmDsQw8 VvehyM5cTamWP/+9VMlkK2Y3KD7nB2vlTmISPFjdXxzn4J+Ei15K0VU62TXnDooEUhL3 5W5gal3AcRAtATSJg5RIONPXEXbmCC4LZO5uRDtxZYpj4RDNgg6mtgRXcdIRMS1vHotR 11OisqQ0z6VIEaCsFjVLKv3zldtWIugLqNZvX8Xma1oMABKlKPysM96j/gcyL7Xioazc JZ5Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FWGFyY3Z9heFTMLnCkSx53cuTFFaq1TFH4FLopVqzNA=; b=ZBb5O7XDd/MHMGxsWQlMOrLSl0IqruUrlg4EDg0n7y6veTHcDmdhKw3rxQzB8s/R9P wHiz9t1bDWFzPTNUSO0x08Br2hAH47L9Jy7UkOBA4movaVKQ7SZmB/c5R5PjItzciKGf 0wpOB91tXmtrQAROsTowWk+sf9FNMdo3C4f+aw9FI0G2gUe2YuHBdwFW3/6xoqIE81WV 1r9xdY24md8jBkKe6+ceXZ3wN6OmOAcoDM35BscHby2r0LeuEKqV3UZ4VA4GbzIunkIr OilR+tUGwccuQUzUBC75NABp4aL1UXKbsdba4fRgHvrtVjRbUxtIlOwyDu6+xz7rZBzU 39OQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530YJoXn4wo7VjlizNQ+wVNzSbIolU5LvkThnvPXcXqqj0H+9Kdb 1P3fqGJ8jTeZtsbLub6CfPJugJORNLUFZUnPcDhJQ7kcTeiJwr3A
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwwlq2WiwAc2Q1qTKc8M8EGX3VLJfRgofBex7Lz66y+nclM+9uDSutbQ+0k3oIqXGoWTdMFGcm6P0EAbfiDGy8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b94b:b029:e3:7f05:dfba with SMTP id h11-20020a170902b94bb02900e37f05dfbamr4180991pls.35.1613658440295; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:27:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAP7zK5bxR9ONqKjp-andF_SQNXJiK2tHkd6LGfKFkfhXixch7g@mail.gmail.com> <8D8B032F-338B-4C1E-B415-B50B8DEED854@tsinghua.org.cn>
In-Reply-To: <8D8B032F-338B-4C1E-B415-B50B8DEED854@tsinghua.org.cn>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 19:56:43 +0530
Message-ID: <CAP7zK5Y++p=zWF22+07k5==pVzw6Mi_s013cfvG7ygYOEZh9rQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001f7ddd05bb9d220e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/vORWl_AuZkzyQchQGNSAS3x1fzg>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:27:23 -0000

Hi Aijun,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 1:33 PM Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
wrote:

> Hi, Dhruv:
> Yes, support its adoption.
> I think the extension can give more spaces to describe the future state of
> LSP.
> One question, is it necessary to be variable length? How to keep align
> when the bit position is fixed but the length is variable?
>
>
Not necessary but for what it's worth it has been done in the past, see
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5088.html#section-4.5
The allocation would start from the most significant bit as bit zero and
remain fixed.

Thanks!
Dhruv



> Aijun Wang
> China Telecom
>
> On Feb 16, 2021, at 19:29, Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> wrote:
>
> 
> Hi WG,
>
> We *need* to hear from more of you before taking a call on adoption. It is
> a straightforward "house-keeping" document, but we need to see explicit
> expressions of support (and comments).
>
> We are extending the call till Friday, Feb 19th. Please respond with your
> support (or not) for this adoption.
>
> Regards,
> Dhruv & Julien
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 11:17 PM Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi WG,
>>
>> This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03.
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03
>>
>> This is a small draft that extends the flags in the LSP Objects by
>> defining a new LSP-EXTENDED-FLAG TLV. Note that the existing
>> sub-registry "LSP Object Flag Field" is almost fully assigned.
>>
>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#lsp-object-flag-field
>>
>> Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons
>> - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are
>> you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to
>> the list.
>>
>> Please respond by Monday 15th Feb.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Dhruv & Julien
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email