Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03
xiong.quan@zte.com.cn Mon, 22 February 2021 08:10 UTC
Return-Path: <xiong.quan@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0669E3A0E11 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:10:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IbNmwccp7ZXt for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:10:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E51123A0BCB for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:10:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.238]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 91746653CC306D6F5815; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 16:10:37 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp01.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.200]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 11M8AGPE048122; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 16:10:16 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from xiong.quan@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp03[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 16:10:16 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 16:10:16 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afb603366e8a7015d67
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202102221610166798478@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5akQ=d+MOEyBwSEPdVAL-RQEUjNM98YZs2mtyj_4=6uWg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 202102220935531496698@zte.com.cn, CAP7zK5akQ=d+MOEyBwSEPdVAL-RQEUjNM98YZs2mtyj_4=6uWg@mail.gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn
To: dd@dhruvdhody.com
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 11M8AGPE048122
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/CmIhOzU9_Qgn80WwBs6RSCSX3nw>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 08:10:43 -0000
Hi Dhruv, Thanks for your suggestion! I agree with you to cite the draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position as an example. But I am not sure about the two wg drafts including draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-06 and draft-ietf-pce-sr-path-segment-03. As far as I know, the last unassigned bit in LSP object is bit 0. It is not enough for the two drafts. Regards, Quan 原始邮件 发件人:DhruvDhody 收件人:熊泉00091065; 抄送人:pce@ietf.org; 日 期 :2021年02月22日 11:48 主 题 :Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Hi Quan, To clarify, - draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid is asking for the allocation in the existing LSP Object Flag Field, after this allocation, there won't be any flags left. - as an example of usage of the new LSP-EXTENDED-FLAG TLV, you should site draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position! Hope this helps you with the text in your draft! Thanks! Dhruv On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 7:06 AM <xiong.quan@zte.com.cn> wrote: > > Hi Adrian and Julien, > > > Many thanks for your suggestions! > > I fully agree with you. The two wg drafts could be viewed as two implementations to use the flag carried in LSP-EXTENDED-FLAG TLV. > > I will add informative references to those two drafts if necessary. And I also suggest those two drafts could add references to the draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag. > > > Regards, > > Quan > > > >Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 > > Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 19 February 2021 16:05 UTCShow header > > >Ah, that's useful. Thanks Julien. > > >Makes this work more pressing. > > >Informative references to those two drafts would help focus the reviewer's mind and might be handy when this draft overtakes those other two documents and goes to the IESG. > > >Cheers, > >Adrian > > -----Original Message----- > From: julien.meuric@orange.com <julien.meuric@orange.com> Sent: 19 February 2021 14:38 > To: adrian@olddog.co.ukCc: pce@ietf.orgSubject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 > > >Hi Adrian, > > >Thank you for your feedback. > > >If evidence is needed, how about binding label?https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-06#section-11.2Note it's also reused inhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-sr-path-segment-03#section-4.2Have a nice week-end, > > >Julien > > > On 18/02/2021 16:57, Adrian Farrel wrote: > > Thanks to the authors for cleaning this up a lot since last time. > > > > I don't object to adoption. Would be nice to have evidence of someone > > needing a bit now, but by the time this becomes an RFC it is reasonably > > possible. > > > > Adrian > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pce <pce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody > > Sent: 01 February 2021 17:48 > > > > Hi WG, > > > > This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03. > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03> > > This is a small draft that extends the flags in the LSP Objects by > > defining a new LSP-EXTENDED-FLAG TLV. Note that the existing > > sub-registry "LSP Object Flag Field" is almost fully assigned. > > > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#lsp-object-flag-field> > > Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons > > - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are > > you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to > > the list. > > > > Please respond by Monday 15th Feb. > > > > Thanks! > > Dhruv & Julien > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pce mailing list > > Pce@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce> > > _______________________________________________ > > Pce mailing list > > Pce@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce> > > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
- [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 xiong.quan
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 chen.ran
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 zhang.zheng
- [Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Cyril Margaria
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 xiong.quan
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Dhruv Dhody
- [Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Zhenghaomian
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 liu.yao71
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 peng.shaofu
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Aijun Wang
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 julien.meuric
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 olivier.dugeon
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 xiong.quan
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 xiong.quan
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Jeff Tantsura