Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03

Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> Mon, 22 February 2021 03:46 UTC

Return-Path: <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68793A0C9E for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 19:46:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Y2ict2TYsHs for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 19:46:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 129033A0C9F for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 19:46:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id e9so8135039pjj.0 for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 19:46:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1aPRX7UjSks/78Kbm0C7w9L+009pTVY1ckoLFDhL244=; b=gyYKB42iYI9v6TLW+HrHPxbTG4aHWcGSIl5krDyuUjSUBI5wsiYAbAPp4stdJfcjNL abhB1FJH4wvp8sdiVveRHcTC2LeJxVT5bVuzCvAMN8Q9QB0YoS5n3gh3F1KJP1fJuTLi z3NZHtsB4shexOLOexo0Vfe8MiTze7qEVk/+Xp3avuG45sl0+rVoLqV0lXC1YFLRjWNx GxM3G7Uu1cJKmHzyiwvFw8Qmx/j1BQPodGik0AXdwN1pazIhk3hlkkLSRqqX/ybaCLLH JVZ6MYF2fKhLVrIgQf1+zedrt+WgHrCccVcSnz0lI+KvNK/OLVlsjCp2BbxMebmiH0d+ oSVA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1aPRX7UjSks/78Kbm0C7w9L+009pTVY1ckoLFDhL244=; b=O1RdbvnKCpKcz5bNQm/cLpWmos/waKVRnPfbujoOoxp71YJMbvVim06GS3+4l02L3R 2oXvNBs4bqXp3OMgaycN2RQnqQ9NRM1WX905EonDa7Rr3DPvKXYl+1za0apoxUm+jU39 bi6XRTxd7fchbEiBWupJM3WJ7zXgOIEeOoKId8fYPbzXnPHRzHHa1qmXS7TioimePcD8 0YjpjhZx99VXY8BoIRcfAeC1XyLGv+lOiPM66RqkO9Ah2rsKdR5qiPaY81PDgyAJ4t7B Rt9RGkbs9Ty2anS4uwVL4v29Jn0U1UJ01uVY6M1BdNpXPa7v5+2SOaz/rpHRr1yfaZM8 2NYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532YlHXhxi2cZZ6o2cx1vBqKq8YfOWtKZ8TkqdaNbGrbdja0+9ZR HBV3nebN0NNIk93O0T4Hi76yUQwl3KxN32iLT4plJw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzwIgo2eEUTJu6Ezf9C84nfmT51UW1oWZekjKAoumYUXhOdrJsad3mTQgtABr1AQAnva9qbvDMixPCzE9TO8oE=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a40b:b029:e0:1096:7fb with SMTP id p11-20020a170902a40bb02900e0109607fbmr12878855plq.40.1613965602414; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 19:46:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <202102220935531496698@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <202102220935531496698@zte.com.cn>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 09:16:06 +0530
Message-ID: <CAP7zK5akQ=d+MOEyBwSEPdVAL-RQEUjNM98YZs2mtyj_4=6uWg@mail.gmail.com>
To: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn
Cc: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>, pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/pBWl_d9mXSGSUk48YB8RuaPqq8s>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 03:46:45 -0000

Hi Quan,

To clarify,

- draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid is asking for the allocation in the
existing LSP Object Flag Field, after this allocation, there won't be
any flags left.
- as an example of usage of the new LSP-EXTENDED-FLAG TLV, you should
site draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position!

Hope this helps you with the text in your draft!

Thanks!
Dhruv

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 7:06 AM <xiong.quan@zte.com.cn> wrote:
>
> Hi  Adrian and Julien,
>
>
> Many thanks for your suggestions!
>
> I fully agree with you. The two wg drafts could be viewed as two implementations to use the flag carried in LSP-EXTENDED-FLAG TLV.
>
> I will add informative references to those two drafts if necessary.  And I also suggest those two drafts could add references to the draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Quan
>
>
> >Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03
>
> Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 19 February 2021 16:05 UTCShow header
>
> >Ah, that's useful. Thanks Julien.
>
> >Makes this work more pressing.
>
> >Informative references to those two drafts would help focus the reviewer's mind and might be handy when this draft overtakes those other two documents and goes to the IESG.
>
> >Cheers,
> >Adrian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: julien.meuric@orange.com <julien.meuric@orange.com> Sent: 19 February 2021 14:38
> To: adrian@olddog.co.ukCc: pce@ietf.orgSubject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03
>
> >Hi Adrian,
>
> >Thank you for your feedback.
>
> >If evidence is needed, how about binding label?https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-06#section-11.2Note it's also reused inhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-sr-path-segment-03#section-4.2Have a nice week-end,
>
> >Julien
>
>
> On 18/02/2021 16:57, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> > Thanks to the authors for cleaning this up a lot since last time.
> >
> > I don't object to adoption. Would be nice to have evidence of someone
> > needing a bit now, but by the time this becomes an RFC it is reasonably
> > possible.
> >
> > Adrian
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pce <pce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
> > Sent: 01 February 2021 17:48
> >
> > Hi WG,
> >
> > This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03.
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03>
> > This is a small draft that extends the flags in the LSP Objects by
> > defining a new LSP-EXTENDED-FLAG TLV. Note that the existing
> > sub-registry "LSP Object Flag Field" is almost fully assigned.
> >
> > https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#lsp-object-flag-field>
> > Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons
> > - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are
> > you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to
> > the list.
> >
> > Please respond by Monday 15th Feb.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Dhruv & Julien
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pce mailing list
> > Pce@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pce mailing list
> > Pce@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce