Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com> Tue, 23 January 2018 03:24 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B75126C0F for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:24:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VcImy2kbKZnV for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:24:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 576E41205D3 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:24:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LHREML710-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id D493F68DB806C for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 03:24:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from BLREML701-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.20.4.170) by LHREML710-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 03:24:34 +0000
Received: from BLREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.9.219]) by blreml701-cah.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 08:54:25 +0530
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
To: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request
Thread-Index: AQHTk5J+e6QWqKkp+UqNJm0iZC+PHqOAy5sg
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 03:24:24 +0000
Message-ID: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8D60DF0C@BLREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <e57633d6-7d71-f1e0-577d-7bf7cb049b2b@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <e57633d6-7d71-f1e0-577d-7bf7cb049b2b@orange.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.149.39]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/6vIM4lBkLeeYDJQ1WXrcTSuqf4w>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 03:24:38 -0000

Support WG Adoption! 

Regards,
Dhruv (as a co-author)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
> Sent: 22 January 2018 20:35
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Back in Prague, draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request raised clear interest.
> Since then, the authors have done their homework, including the removal of
> suggested values. Let us now share the question with the whole WG: do you
> think draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request is a good foundation for a PCE
> WG item?
> Please send your responses to the PCE list, including rationales in case
> of disagreement.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jon & Julien
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce