IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request

Satish K <satish.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 24 January 2018 03:46 UTC

Return-Path: <satish.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E24512D775 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:46:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n_PZ4H-HRSv5 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:46:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x22c.google.com (mail-it0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAA301275C5 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:46:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id u62so3588820ita.2 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:46:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=B6A8TFRpkiXuC4j4EpHq7RkrblZb0RaaFKGPDFnC6KM=; b=dnv25pSR0meJMABpBdP29vDfb0puFFPCMKx+DPy0mUWrPr2qkbd8Q8RbBAhiCqTqnL akY6IhY9fZG6ceCXRaI8z8vAin0Xihmm2BKPBDZ3Hlb6bF4+1i0eSVm6b3wIal93/EjX WeUYKn+OazxabhAaqno+I5hD610AkXLE9/ednunCxZ1nM+qECN8YoFOHpFowOZ8++i89 GWxonaVPHZr5KaR2r6xzM6F2bpwHXsMCuY2jBXOYdLOHmWwutW2QS916wZcaJT4Y2E4L TKdMJXQm97/JWq3MfB+Oms/FjGhk8uVPX3+vslLZrxz4MvW/MUaiGo8NUjat3RiVhFhp uzKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=B6A8TFRpkiXuC4j4EpHq7RkrblZb0RaaFKGPDFnC6KM=; b=r5Lbrlp48ghntElPWdGVptZbCQ9cIZrLzNvJRl3B0bAAis8BnaLJuTEj/sogRX11J2 zrzN2Mw/bto7eFthcWpQIFdiMw5ZOaCdJLt3apzzhgwkcr5PTUh2wEFS2KLicvj7oVSo c43dakPyBjVcqRiZ4Zj/pQplkjsZWeLYH8vmtiCGe1n684Pm83RwB8yGz7e78wkVB8I1 6VMxyz8owq9R4GbR/U3mstOGXsZxf82/mTh7l//H98RtjLKFiHcs+hnD9J+i81Xu+oT7 32id5R/ql3AWMhWVfqkdQ2N9MDIPX4LGan2gx0hnIygUQSqYJ784HOBLl5YV5qlH7mol NWQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdLLJ+Y6h7cPf7/mQLIieBzEEwi0Ucp43ZKVWMLNjDCdz2wf1rL rRjBTIPzRTxRVMbeUwmVOKOVOyjY4gr5AQkD9Ls=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227cKtNqZGAAOXUGudg8gMX/CSdpin2hZc85V9e8ZVh7B7U5adsoqwQ+cDUeWfcuj2zk40z83hWZd7DB/BE9rmc=
X-Received: by 10.36.157.69 with SMTP id f66mr7032946itd.136.1516765609236; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:46:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.107.145 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:46:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <e57633d6-7d71-f1e0-577d-7bf7cb049b2b@orange.com>
References: <e57633d6-7d71-f1e0-577d-7bf7cb049b2b@orange.com>
From: Satish K <satish.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 09:16:48 +0530
Message-ID: <CABfSohEmAi6ErgthfWBsuH9At7VZRQMNXhQ+SP8HtSRZ2_HZJw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1145126e589ec205637d8311"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/rgJPM8jm29Wyngp84Ifzz0hE9rg>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 03:46:52 -0000

Hi All,

As a developer of PCEP/PCE in ONOS controller, where in especially in the
multi-instance, multi-cluster environment of ONOS, a particular instance
act as a master for few devices(PCC) and wish to take control of LSP's from
PCC. So i strongly support this for WG adaption.

Regards,
Satish.

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 8:35 PM, Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Back in Prague, draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request raised clear
> interest. Since then, the authors have done their homework, including
> the removal of suggested values. Let us now share the question with the
> whole WG: do you think draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request is a good
> foundation for a PCE WG item?
> Please send your responses to the PCE list, including rationales in case
> of disagreement.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jon & Julien
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email