IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request

"Jay Karthik (jakarthi)" <jakarthi@cisco.com> Sat, 03 February 2018 01:12 UTC

Return-Path: <jakarthi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCDB124234 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 17:12:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C40oPHhzX5Ne for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 17:12:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03D531200C1 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 17:12:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1122; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1517620343; x=1518829943; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=yThKQlCfpYI0VcEhoLZ9wBQnX5937cWSro3cHZhIbj4=; b=ecN8q43NatvJzC4Jpj3TMT+dm5n4pjG0p0/RW3RqMX7G5weVefWPELiC YO+3GjX8oMjOicqX1yB3lZCtrJUx9JF4ehitqeDWQzqsVb+XNxmfsWon9 Pk764MS5Oq1EclLTj5aHYO9899WUPhJzVMFHe5Q+z8j3H35Wu2MN0BJ8c 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CmAAAFC3Va/5xdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNRZnAoCoNbiiSOLplKghgKGAuFGAIagh5UGAEBAQEBAQEBAmsohSQCBAEBIRE6GwIBCBoCJgICAiULFRACBAESijUQtT2CJ4UAg3iCBgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgQ+DWoIVgVeCEYMFgTCBfwEBAoFvgxcxgjQFo09VApVugh6GJYtxl0QCERkBgTsBHzmBUHAVPSoBghuEd3iLFoEXAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,452,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="65069619"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Feb 2018 01:12:22 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com (xch-aln-017.cisco.com [173.36.7.27]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w131CLfY029603 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 3 Feb 2018 01:12:21 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-018.cisco.com (173.37.102.28) by XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com (173.36.7.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 19:12:21 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-018.cisco.com ([173.37.102.28]) by XCH-RCD-018.cisco.com ([173.37.102.28]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 19:12:21 -0600
From: "Jay Karthik (jakarthi)" <jakarthi@cisco.com>
To: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request
Thread-Index: AQHTk5JtY4UqI+wxbU+fzslHHiA7sqOSAZSA
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 01:12:21 +0000
Message-ID: <23DD05E0-81A9-4E1E-B63F-C5B16DF6CB1B@cisco.com>
References: <e57633d6-7d71-f1e0-577d-7bf7cb049b2b@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <e57633d6-7d71-f1e0-577d-7bf7cb049b2b@orange.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1a.0.160910
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.170.138]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <AB7CD0B9A3BB454284CB9A100DB1F7D8@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/vX8c-ZivnMzC-DYBkZokLABU5rk>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 01:12:25 -0000

Yes/support as co-author.

Thanks,
Jay

On 1/22/18, 10:05 AM, "Pce on behalf of Julien Meuric" <pce-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of julien.meuric@orange.com> wrote:

    Hi all,
    
    Back in Prague, draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request raised clear
    interest. Since then, the authors have done their homework, including
    the removal of suggested values. Let us now share the question with the
    whole WG: do you think draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request is a good
    foundation for a PCE WG item?
    Please send your responses to the PCE list, including rationales in case
    of disagreement.
    
    Thanks,
    
    Jon & Julien
    
    _______________________________________________
    Pce mailing list
    Pce@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email