IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request

"Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com> Mon, 05 February 2018 15:09 UTC

Return-Path: <rgandhi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E0E12D80F for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 07:09:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D6wxq4pYEl7w for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 07:09:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C24812D84B for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 07:09:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1192; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1517843389; x=1519052989; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Pwd7Dc/aTEUeyFSchAn9o4qVara304emNREm0J1DqVc=; b=G2651fGN3yFz929CFJ6S6uGe5uu/drIfpymmzvsMFEr9eU1wOwXskVIP nj4BdYG4xXRcuMkkgzACZrbz6leVfX8N/i1nX76if22lQ/Gsn8auUrJjA gZEyEzW3pscgupN3BfyoZ01AHGGz/Q8qQ6mNhXMqb4KI+RW8ZxTKQWg+3 w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CkAQAzc3ha/40NJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNRZnAoCoNbmFKBW5dvghgKGAuFGAIagi9VFwEBAQEBAQEBAmsohSQCBAEBIRE6GwIBCBoCJgICAiULFRACBAESijUQvyuCJ4UAg3OCBgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgQ+DW4IVgVeCEQyCeYEwgX8BAQKBbxeDADGCNAWjUFUClW+CHoYmi3OXSQIRGQGBOwEhATaBUHAVPSoBghuEd3iNX4EXAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,465,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="352175016"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Feb 2018 15:09:31 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com (xch-rcd-019.cisco.com [173.37.102.29]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w15F9V7s007904 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:09:31 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com (173.36.7.28) by XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com (173.37.102.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 09:09:29 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) by XCH-ALN-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 09:09:30 -0600
From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>
To: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request
Thread-Index: AQHTk5Jthp24Vsv5okqJZPJep/PsYaOWEEGA
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 15:09:30 +0000
Message-ID: <B63F82B1-B033-4286-9A89-1755B8CE0C38@cisco.com>
References: <e57633d6-7d71-f1e0-577d-7bf7cb049b2b@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <e57633d6-7d71-f1e0-577d-7bf7cb049b2b@orange.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1d.0.161209
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.86.244.157]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B5C6A295BA7C0B4688EACE323C2AC4CC@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/sVwk3C4CWqasr0alR7zp-JERd7k>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 15:09:57 -0000

Hi WG, Julien,

Yes, Support the adoption of this important draft.

Thanks,
Rakesh


On 2018-01-22, 10:05 AM, "Pce on behalf of Julien Meuric" <pce-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of julien.meuric@orange.com> wrote:

    Hi all,
    
    Back in Prague, draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request raised clear
    interest. Since then, the authors have done their homework, including
    the removal of suggested values. Let us now share the question with the
    whole WG: do you think draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request is a good
    foundation for a PCE WG item?
    Please send your responses to the PCE list, including rationales in case
    of disagreement.
    
    Thanks,
    
    Jon & Julien
    
    _______________________________________________
    Pce mailing list
    Pce@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email