[Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request
Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com> Mon, 22 January 2018 15:05 UTC
Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D9F127444 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 07:05:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.245
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.245 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wt24MnK9O4s9 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 07:05:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.orange.com (p-mail1.rd.orange.com [161.106.1.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661901200C5 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 07:05:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 642FD410262 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:05:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.194.32.11]) by p-mail1.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E697C41025C for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:05:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.193.71.63] (10.193.71.63) by FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (10.194.32.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.361.1; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:05:11 +0100
From: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Organization: Orange
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <e57633d6-7d71-f1e0-577d-7bf7cb049b2b@orange.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:05:11 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/QfDiNcikqKYguaxKQQsLZq_463U>
Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:05:15 -0000
Hi all, Back in Prague, draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request raised clear interest. Since then, the authors have done their homework, including the removal of suggested values. Let us now share the question with the whole WG: do you think draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request is a good foundation for a PCE WG item? Please send your responses to the PCE list, including rationales in case of disagreement. Thanks, Jon & Julien
- [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-contr… Julien Meuric
- Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-c… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-c… Satish K
- Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-c… RAGHURAM, ASWATNARAYAN
- Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-c… GODDARD, AL
- Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-c… Jay Karthik (jakarthi)
- Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-c… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-c… Julien Meuric