IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request

Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com> Fri, 09 February 2018 11:08 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC61126BF0 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Feb 2018 03:08:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT=1.449, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OlMMoSHV-vjV for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Feb 2018 03:08:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from r-mail1.rd.orange.com (r-mail1.rd.orange.com [217.108.152.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16C31200C1 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Feb 2018 03:08:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from r-mail1.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 76BFBA4423F for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Feb 2018 12:08:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.194.32.11]) by r-mail1.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D56FA4423A for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Feb 2018 12:08:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.193.71.63] (10.193.71.63) by FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (10.194.32.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.382.0; Fri, 9 Feb 2018 12:08:39 +0100
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
References: <e57633d6-7d71-f1e0-577d-7bf7cb049b2b@orange.com>
From: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Organization: Orange
Message-ID: <d19b7cc7-83a0-21c8-08b2-86ef900740fc@orange.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 12:08:39 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e57633d6-7d71-f1e0-577d-7bf7cb049b2b@orange.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/pzZ0923Vvo3J8OG8JWJn37VHAVY>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 11:08:43 -0000

Hi all,

Thanks to those who responded to the poll. It confirms the consensus we
originally had in the room. The I-D is adopted as a WG document.

Authors, please submit draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-00.

Cheers,

Jon & Julien


Jan. 22, 2018 - julien.meuric@orange.com:
> Hi all,
> 
> Back in Prague, draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request raised clear
> interest. Since then, the authors have done their homework, including
> the removal of suggested values. Let us now share the question with the
> whole WG: do you think draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request is a good
> foundation for a PCE WG item?
> Please send your responses to the PCE list, including rationales in case
> of disagreement.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jon & Julien
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email