IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption of two new WG documents (P2MP requirement and applicability)

Tomohiro Otani <otani@kddilabs.jp> Mon, 04 August 2008 00:35 UTC

Return-Path: <pce-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pce-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pce-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE6D3A69A9; Sun, 3 Aug 2008 17:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF453A6980 for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Aug 2008 17:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.701, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bl5tOJOfWQHR for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Aug 2008 17:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mandala.kddilabs.jp (unknown [IPv6:2001:200:601:12:230:48ff:fe22:3a84]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001AE3A6893 for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Aug 2008 17:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mandala.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1630EC8A7; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:36:04 +0900 (JST)
Received: from platinum.inc.kddilabs.jp (platinum.inc.kddilabs.jp [2001:200:601:1300:172:19:83:254]) by mandala.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B095EC8F6; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:36:04 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dhcp195.wlan.kddilabs.jp [172.19.110.195]) by platinum.inc.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF047578111; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:36:02 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <48964EE2.3070402@kddilabs.jp>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 09:35:46 +0900
From: Tomohiro Otani <otani@kddilabs.jp>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
References: <C4B78FD3.4C27B%jvasseur@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C4B78FD3.4C27B%jvasseur@cisco.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of two new WG documents (P2MP requirement and applicability)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Sender: pce-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pce-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

Yeah, Those are good.
I am fine with their being adopted as WG documents.

Regards,

Tomo

JP Vasseur さんは書きました:
> Dear WG,
>
> There was a good consensus to adopt the two following documents as PCE 
> WG documents during the meeting in Dublin. As usual, we would like to 
> confirm on the list.
>
> draft-yasukawa-pce-p2mp-app-02.txt
> draft-yasukawa-pce-p2mp-req-05.txt
>
> Could you tell us if you are in favor (or not) of adopting these 
> documents as PCE WG documents ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> JP.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>   


_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email