Re: [Pce] Adoption of two new WG documents (P2MP requirement and applicability)

"Daniel King" <dk@danielking.net> Tue, 05 August 2008 15:00 UTC

Return-Path: <pce-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pce-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pce-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A4C28C2C7; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 08:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D3B28C2C7 for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 08:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SSZGl8E8vgpx for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 08:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.244]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6614928C2BD for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 08:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d18so3694708and.122 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 08:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.134.10 with SMTP id h10mr1562507and.80.1217948446775; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 08:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Serenity ( [72.14.241.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c27sm2867828ana.37.2008.08.05.08.00.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 05 Aug 2008 08:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Daniel King <dk@danielking.net>
To: 'PCE Working Group' <pce@ietf.org>
References: <C4B78FD3.4C27B%jvasseur@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C4B78FD3.4C27B%jvasseur@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:00:49 +0100
Message-ID: <004e01c8f70c$0dd83300$29889900$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcjzHM6MDIXCRwPUGU2yxfO5Ap7uSAD7vnpw
Content-Language: en-gb
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of two new WG documents (P2MP requirement and applicability)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1441564590=="
Sender: pce-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pce-bounces@ietf.org

Hello All,

 

I would support both these documents becoming WG docs. 

 

Br, Dan

 

From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP
Vasseur
Sent: 31 July 2008 15:51
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of two new WG documents (P2MP requirement and
applicability)

 

Dear WG,

There was a good consensus to adopt the two following documents as PCE WG
documents during the meeting in Dublin. As usual, we would like to confirm
on the list.

draft-yasukawa-pce-p2mp-app-02.txt
draft-yasukawa-pce-p2mp-req-05.txt

Could you tell us if you are in favor (or not) of adopting these documents
as PCE WG documents ?

Thanks.

JP. 

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce