IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] Adoption of two new WG documents (P2MP requirement and applicability)

JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com> Thu, 31 July 2008 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <pce-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pce-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pce-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F7943A68A2; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40643A68A2 for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.955
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.955 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.247, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VXcJsaRiEZjV for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013E23A67BD for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.31,287,1215388800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="16130794"
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2008 15:38:43 +0000
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m6VFchrh017087 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:38:43 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6VFcgpH022722 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:38:43 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-213.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.112]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:38:36 -0400
Received: from 10.61.64.244 ([10.61.64.244]) by xmb-rtp-213.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.112]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:38:36 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.11.0.080522
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:50:43 +0100
From: JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
To: pce@ietf.org
Message-ID: <C4B78FD3.4C27B%jvasseur@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Adoption of two new WG documents (P2MP requirement and applicability)
Thread-Index: AcjzHM6MDIXCRwPUGU2yxfO5Ap7uSA==
Mime-version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jul 2008 15:38:36.0566 (UTC) FILETIME=[7F53C360:01C8F323]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1505; t=1217518723; x=1218382723; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jvasseur@cisco.com; z=From:=20JP=20Vasseur=20<jvasseur@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Adoption=20of=20two=20new=20WG=20documents=20(P 2MP=20requirement=20and=20applicability) |Sender:=20 |To:=20<pce@ietf.org>; bh=p8rqDWtFUvjBS68yQKspTE6KSQ5qGAwL8bxWjo4l+T4=; b=FdaFsOPZYQ+syffEUZEyBrqTiTTkGRRScAW91FQHA/911nIsYMl4Bz6AMJ n2sftMZTJ6mLeHxnHgo1hiI4n+JXzClGTwMBRcT0NHCqb8+xr3VfPjsu2Sek sXT9BvRjR1;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=jvasseur@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of two new WG documents (P2MP requirement and applicability)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1253628511=="
Sender: pce-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pce-bounces@ietf.org

Dear WG,

There was a good consensus to adopt the two following documents as PCE WG
documents during the meeting in Dublin. As usual, we would like to confirm
on the list.

draft-yasukawa-pce-p2mp-app-02.txt
draft-yasukawa-pce-p2mp-req-05.txt

Could you tell us if you are in favor (or not) of adopting these documents
as PCE WG documents ?

Thanks.

JP.

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email