Re: [Pce] Adoption of two new WG documents (P2MP requirement andapplicability)

"Fabien Verhaeghe" <fabien.verhaeghe@marben-products.com> Thu, 31 July 2008 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <pce-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pce-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pce-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0093A6C67; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807363A6BAE for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58kPCOjPkxKA for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bizpsie4.9services.com (bizpsie4.9services.com [84.96.93.162]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6570F3A6C14 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pooky.marben-products.com ([86.65.15.130]) by bizpsie4.9services.com with 9services id wfrv1Z0032oN1dS04frvyb; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:51:57 +0200
X-Biz3: ??
X-VRSPAM-SCORE: -150.00
Received: from AOFR11476 ([192.168.20.7]) by pooky.marben-products.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m6VFpNHm031574; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:51:23 +0200
From: Fabien Verhaeghe <fabien.verhaeghe@marben-products.com>
To: 'JP Vasseur' <jvasseur@cisco.com>, pce@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:47:56 +0200
Message-ID: <001401c8f31c$6ed3b060$0714a8c0@marbenproducts.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: AcjzHM6MDIXCRwPUGU2yxfO5Ap7uSAAAHjrw
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
In-Reply-To: <C4B78FD3.4C27B%jvasseur@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of two new WG documents (P2MP requirement andapplicability)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1752309006=="
Sender: pce-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pce-bounces@ietf.org

In favor.

 

 

  _____  

De : pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de JP
Vasseur
Envoyé : jeudi 31 juillet 2008 16:51
À : pce@ietf.org
Objet : [Pce] Adoption of two new WG documents (P2MP requirement
andapplicability)

 

Dear WG,

There was a good consensus to adopt the two following documents as PCE WG
documents during the meeting in Dublin. As usual, we would like to confirm
on the list.

draft-yasukawa-pce-p2mp-app-02.txt
draft-yasukawa-pce-p2mp-req-05.txt

Could you tell us if you are in favor (or not) of adopting these documents
as PCE WG documents ?

Thanks.

JP. 

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce