IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption of two new WG documents (P2MP requirementandapplicability)

<jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ftgroup.com> Wed, 06 August 2008 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <pce-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pce-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pce-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91C03A68E1; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 06:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E053A68AE for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 06:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZZW52zG+zwiI for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 06:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DB53A6B93 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 06:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.193.117.152]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 15:12:28 +0200
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:12:27 +0200
Message-ID: <D109C8C97C15294495117745780657AE0A410922@ftrdmel1>
In-Reply-To: <007701c8f76c$8e99ec80$f987380a@nsl.ad.nec.co.jp>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Adoption of two new WG documents (P2MP requirementandapplicability)
Thread-Index: AcjzHM6MDIXCRwPUGU2yxfO5Ap7uSAET6RagABZgqkA=
References: <C4B78FD3.4C27B%jvasseur@cisco.com> <007701c8f76c$8e99ec80$f987380a@nsl.ad.nec.co.jp>
From: jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ftgroup.com
To: i-nishioka@cb.jp.nec.com, jvasseur@cisco.com, pce@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Aug 2008 13:12:28.0860 (UTC) FILETIME=[13D87FC0:01C8F7C6]
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of two new WG documents (P2MP requirementandapplicability)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1250920860=="
Sender: pce-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pce-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Folks,
 
In favor for these two docs.
 
JL

	
	

________________________________

		From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org]
On Behalf Of JP Vasseur
		Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 11:51 PM
		To: pce@ietf.org
		Subject: [Pce] Adoption of two new WG documents (P2MP
requirement andapplicability)
		
		
		Dear WG,
		
		There was a good consensus to adopt the two following
documents as PCE WG documents during the meeting in Dublin. As usual, we
would like to confirm on the list.
		
		draft-yasukawa-pce-p2mp-app-02.txt
		draft-yasukawa-pce-p2mp-req-05.txt
		
		Could you tell us if you are in favor (or not) of
adopting these documents as PCE WG documents ?
		
		Thanks.
		
		JP. 


_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email