Re: [Pce] Adoption of two new WG documents (P2MP requirement andapplicability)

<julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com> Tue, 05 August 2008 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <pce-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pce-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pce-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36C63A68B2; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 07:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066103A68B2 for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 07:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.817
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.817 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.432, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sOCf6UwsevLP for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 07:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.15]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7BF83A679C for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 07:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FTRDMEL2.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.193.117.153]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 5 Aug 2008 16:05:23 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:00:42 +0200
Message-ID: <7DBAFEC6A76F3E42817DF1EBE64CB02605C593A1@ftrdmel2>
In-Reply-To: <C4B78FD3.4C27B%jvasseur@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Adoption of two new WG documents (P2MP requirement andapplicability)
Thread-Index: AcjzHM6MDIXCRwPUGU2yxfO5Ap7uSAD5rfkw
References: <C4B78FD3.4C27B%jvasseur@cisco.com>
From: julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com
To: jvasseur@cisco.com, pce@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Aug 2008 14:05:23.0390 (UTC) FILETIME=[4D9995E0:01C8F704]
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of two new WG documents (P2MP requirement andapplicability)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: pce-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pce-bounces@ietf.org

Hi.

I agree on adoption.

Julien

________________________________

From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP
Vasseur

Dear WG,

There was a good consensus to adopt the two following documents as PCE
WG documents during the meeting in Dublin. As usual, we would like to
confirm on the list.

draft-yasukawa-pce-p2mp-app-02.txt
draft-yasukawa-pce-p2mp-req-05.txt

Could you tell us if you are in favor (or not) of adopting these
documents as PCE WG documents ?

Thanks.

JP. 
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce