Re: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds

"Fabien Verhaeghe" <fabien.verhaeghe@marben-products.com> Mon, 01 September 2008 06:24 UTC

Return-Path: <pce-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pce-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pce-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3DB28C18D; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 23:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F343A6A08 for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 23:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DUhVgsP4pLox for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 23:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bizpsie4.9services.com (bizpsie4.9services.com [84.96.93.162]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879FE3A6AEC for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 23:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pooky.marben-products.com ([86.65.15.130]) by bizpsie4.9services.com with 9services id 9JQi1a0022oN1dS04JQi9f; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 08:24:42 +0200
X-Biz3: ??
X-VRSPAM-SCORE: -100.00
Received: from AOFR11476 (aofr11476.marben-products.com [192.168.7.180]) by pooky.marben-products.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m816Nnes021993; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 08:23:49 +0200
From: Fabien Verhaeghe <fabien.verhaeghe@marben-products.com>
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, pce@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 08:23:09 +0200
Message-ID: <000101c90bfb$37a6e0b0$b407a8c0@marbenproducts.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: Acj7p0JFQwwyT8w1Spu53QLp+oWbwAQU9YNQ
In-Reply-To: <200808111140.m7BBe1Aa025438@mta7.iomartmail.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: pce-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pce-bounces@ietf.org

I support all three documents.

Best regards
Fabien


> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de
> Adrian Farrel
> Envoyé : lundi 11 août 2008 13:40
> À : pce@ietf.org
> Objet : [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Following up some actions from Dublin...
> 
> Can you please express an opinion on whether the following thress I-Ds are
> ready to
> be /should be adopted as PCE working group I-Ds.
> 
> draft-zhao-pcep-p2mp-extension
> draft-otani-pce-gmpls-aps-req
> draft-nishioka-pce-svec-list
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce