IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds

"Itaru Nishioka" <i-nishioka@cb.jp.nec.com> Mon, 18 August 2008 00:47 UTC

Return-Path: <pce-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pce-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pce-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474F53A6809; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D2D3A6809 for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.51
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sb9g7AhwMLS1 for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp [202.32.8.193]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA9D3A679C for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp (mailgate53D.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.160]) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m7I0ltOx010622; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:47:55 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id m7I0lti16949; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:47:55 +0900 (JST)
Received: from saigo.jp.nec.com (saigo.jp.nec.com [10.26.220.6]) by mailsv3.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m7I0lsLC007181; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:47:55 +0900 (JST)
Received: from C08AUG00201 ([10.56.131.165] [10.56.131.165]) by mail.jp.nec.com with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:41:33 +0900
From: Itaru Nishioka <i-nishioka@cb.jp.nec.com>
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, pce@ietf.org
References: <200808111140.m7BBe1Aa025438@mta7.iomartmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200808111140.m7BBe1Aa025438@mta7.iomartmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:41:33 +0900
Organization: NEC
Message-Id: <F535E40A4FF24A64B91C97EE88B563C7@nsl.ad.nec.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: Acj7pyptJPO2Y/jURCWZI8aA+BmvWQFInueg
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18000
Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: i-nishioka@cb.jp.nec.com
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: pce-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pce-bounces@ietf.org

Hi

I would support these draft as WG I-Ds.
(for the last one  from one of the authors.)

Thanks,
Itaru.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 8:40 PM
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Following up some actions from Dublin...
> 
> Can you please express an opinion on whether the following 
> thress I-Ds are ready to be /should be adopted as PCE working 
> group I-Ds.
> 
> draft-zhao-pcep-p2mp-extension
> draft-otani-pce-gmpls-aps-req
> draft-nishioka-pce-svec-list
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email