Re: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds

"Daniel King" <dk@danielking.net> Mon, 18 August 2008 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <pce-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pce-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pce-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7506B3A68F1; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DAEC3A6852 for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_33=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gJplm1EpmDvc for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8173A68F1 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b11so1158922nfh.39 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.210.70.14 with SMTP id s14mr8624407eba.79.1219094453897; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Serenity ( [88.97.23.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t2sm13889001gve.9.2008.08.18.14.20.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Daniel King <dk@danielking.net>
To: pce@ietf.org
References: <200808111140.m7BBe1Aa025438@mta7.iomartmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200808111140.m7BBe1Aa025438@mta7.iomartmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 22:20:59 +0100
Message-ID: <005701c90178$515e7d20$f41b7760$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Acj7pyptLCPuB7cqRUqAdIyb+FG8wwF0K0Mg
Content-Language: en-gb
Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: pce-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pce-bounces@ietf.org

Hi PCE'ers, 

I would like to support all three documents as WG I-Ds. I am a co-author for
draft-zhao-pcep-p2mp-extension and draft-nishioka-pce-svec-list. 

Br, Dan. 

-----Original Message-----
From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian
Farrel
Sent: 11 August 2008 12:40
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds

Hi,

Following up some actions from Dublin...

Can you please express an opinion on whether the following thress I-Ds are
ready to 
be /should be adopted as PCE working group I-Ds.

draft-zhao-pcep-p2mp-extension
draft-otani-pce-gmpls-aps-req
draft-nishioka-pce-svec-list

Thanks,
Adrian
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce