Re: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds

"Dean Cheng (dcheng)" <dcheng@cisco.com> Mon, 18 August 2008 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <pce-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pce-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pce-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B6F3A6D43; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E372E28C149 for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F6pKWxwvqiCo for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276DC3A6D23 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,229,1217808000"; d="scan'208";a="141473458"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Aug 2008 16:24:13 +0000
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m7IGODNQ029032; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:24:13 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m7IGODpU016917; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:24:13 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-234.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.111]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:24:13 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:24:12 -0700
Message-ID: <70BC84B185C3EE448EDB7AB8956D3B0E06392D38@xmb-sjc-234.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <200808111140.m7BBe1Aa025438@mta7.iomartmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds
Thread-Index: Acj7p0Ot4MFvIHzLTVSq/j9RXFshCQFp46cg
References: <200808111140.m7BBe1Aa025438@mta7.iomartmail.com>
From: "Dean Cheng (dcheng)" <dcheng@cisco.com>
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, pce@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Aug 2008 16:24:13.0403 (UTC) FILETIME=[DA0B72B0:01C9014E]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=740; t=1219076653; x=1219940653; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dcheng@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Dean=20Cheng=20(dcheng)=22=20<dcheng@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[Pce]=20Poll=20on=20further=20WG=20I-Ds |Sender:=20; bh=pNomSzqVOWtobZdQ4POHcPHZDZqOATsrQVRRos4DeMk=; b=Z2HBnIYT+O7lMINtd+Tnci/JzLUlOAyyjcG0kJkiA4og83NBYrpLXYoWO5 KFoyyFBhfDwR03jiPRnvmEb7RgXgX6n2GyQJ1qbWmXhiZLt3EvM0w/9mmhMN pzRyL9Iamp;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=dcheng@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: pce-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pce-bounces@ietf.org

Yes for all.

Dean 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 4:40 AM
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Following up some actions from Dublin...
> 
> Can you please express an opinion on whether the following 
> thress I-Ds are ready to be /should be adopted as PCE working 
> group I-Ds.
> 
> draft-zhao-pcep-p2mp-extension
> draft-otani-pce-gmpls-aps-req
> draft-nishioka-pce-svec-list
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> 
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce