[Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds

Young Lee <ylee@huawei.com> Tue, 19 August 2008 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <pce-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pce-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pce-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364223A6A8D; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DD83A69B6 for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gCL41XOrrCVN for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usaga04-in.huawei.com (usaga04-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.180]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC88E3A69B7 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:01:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (usaga04-in [172.18.9.16]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0K5U00G97RSNU0@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for pce@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:48:24 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from L73682 ([10.124.12.74]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K5U000QXRSKUS@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for pce@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:48:23 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:48:14 -0500
From: Young Lee <ylee@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <mailman.28.1219086005.26474.pce@ietf.org>
To: pce@ietf.org
Message-id: <005801c9020a$9c2c7ea0$4a0c7c0a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-index: AckBZKj4hbvsM/zgSzCKh1ggTkJnEQApdRqw
References: <mailman.28.1219086005.26474.pce@ietf.org>
Subject: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: pce-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pce-bounces@ietf.org

I support all three. 

Young

-----Original Message-----
From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
pce-request@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 2:00 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Pce Digest, Vol 48, Issue 10

Send Pce mailing list submissions to
	pce@ietf.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	pce-request@ietf.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	pce-owner@ietf.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Pce digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Poll on further WG I-Ds (Itaru Nishioka)
   2. Re: Poll on further WG I-Ds (Zafar Ali (zali))
   3. Re: Poll on further WG I-Ds (Dean Cheng (dcheng))


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:41:33 +0900
From: "Itaru Nishioka" <i-nishioka@cb.jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds
To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, <pce@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <F535E40A4FF24A64B91C97EE88B563C7@nsl.ad.nec.co.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

Hi

I would support these draft as WG I-Ds.
(for the last one  from one of the authors.)

Thanks,
Itaru.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 8:40 PM
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Following up some actions from Dublin...
> 
> Can you please express an opinion on whether the following 
> thress I-Ds are ready to be /should be adopted as PCE working 
> group I-Ds.
> 
> draft-zhao-pcep-p2mp-extension
> draft-otani-pce-gmpls-aps-req
> draft-nishioka-pce-svec-list
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:08:54 -0400
From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds
To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, <pce@ietf.org>
Message-ID:
	
<BABC859E6D0B9A4D8448CC7F41CD2B0706F0F6FF@xmb-rtp-203.amer.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of 
> > Adrian Farrel
> > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 8:40 PM
> > To: pce@ietf.org
> > Subject: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Following up some actions from Dublin...
> > 
> > Can you please express an opinion on whether the following 
> thress I-Ds 
> > are ready to be /should be adopted as PCE working group I-Ds.
> > 
> > draft-zhao-pcep-p2mp-extension
> > draft-otani-pce-gmpls-aps-req

In favor for both.  

> > draft-nishioka-pce-svec-list
> > 

Absent. 

> > Thanks,
> > Adrian
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pce mailing list
> > Pce@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> 


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:24:12 -0700
From: "Dean Cheng (dcheng)" <dcheng@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds
To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, <pce@ietf.org>
Message-ID:
	
<70BC84B185C3EE448EDB7AB8956D3B0E06392D38@xmb-sjc-234.amer.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

Yes for all.

Dean 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 4:40 AM
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Following up some actions from Dublin...
> 
> Can you please express an opinion on whether the following 
> thress I-Ds are ready to be /should be adopted as PCE working 
> group I-Ds.
> 
> draft-zhao-pcep-p2mp-extension
> draft-otani-pce-gmpls-aps-req
> draft-nishioka-pce-svec-list
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> 


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce


End of Pce Digest, Vol 48, Issue 10
***********************************


_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce